Reeta Lakhmani, Kolkata VS Pr.CIT - 10 , Kolkata

Last updated: 16 December 2020
Quick Summary
This case consolidates multiple appeals filed by members of the Lakhmani family against an order by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-10, Kolkata. The appeals, all pertaining to the Assessment Year 2014-15, were heard together due to identical issues and facts. The order was passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Court :
ITAT Kolkata

Brief :
All these appeals are filed by different assessees belonging to the same familyand all the appeals are directed against the order of the Pr. Commissioner of the IncomeTax-10, Kolkata (hereinafter the ‘Pr. CIT’) dated 11.12.2018 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), for the Assessment Year 2014-15.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 44/Kol/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  2. CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork
  3. CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation
  4. CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence
  5. CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents
  6. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  7. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation
  8. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  9. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  10. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member svgovindarajusvgovindarajuPro Member Sumith KSSumith KSPro Member CA Reshma prabhu CA Reshma prabhuPro Member Vinod PatilVinod PatilPro Member Tax SimplifiedTax Simplified
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category