Uday Punj (HUF), New Delhi ITO WARD - 32(2), New Delhi

Author
View profile
Last updated: 17 December 2020
Quick Summary
This appeal concerns Uday Punj (HUF) challenging an addition of Rs. 28,64,419/- made by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, read with Rule 8D. The assessee's appeal against the ITO's order, which confirmed this addition, was dismissed by the CIT(A). The core of the appeal is that the addition was made incorrectly and against the facts of the case.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is filed by the Assessee - Uday Punj (HUF) against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-11, New Delhi dated15.01.2020 for the assessment year 2016-17 whereinthe appeal filed by the assessee against the order of theITO, Ward 32(2), New Delhi passed u/s. 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961 on 29.12.2018 making the addition of Rs. 28,64,419/- u/s. 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D was dismissed and the above addition was confirmed.

Citation :
ITA NO. 643/DEL/2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694

 
downloaded 310 times


Guest

Judgement posted by

Guest

View Judgements
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. No Fresh Pre-Deposit for GSTAT Appeal When Earlier Deposit Already Covers 20% of Disputed Tax
  2. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  3. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  4. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  5. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  6. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  7. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  8. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  9. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  10. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member shashishashiPro Member B L BhojwaniB L BhojwaniPro Member DHANASHRI KARMARKAR DHANASHRI KARMARKAR Pro Member CA. K. BRAHMANAYAGAMCA. K. BRAHMANAYAGAMPro Member CA Varun GuptaCA Varun Gupta
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
02 November 2026
Audit Executive

SRJP & Co LLP

Kochi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
21 October 2026
CA INTER/ BCOM WITH EXPERIENCE

CA S KUMAR GUPTA & CO

Amritsar

CA Inter

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 October 2026
CA Articleship / Article Assistant

M N Rao & Associates LLP

Vijayawada

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
10 November 2026
FP&A Executive

Gujarat Guardian

Ankleshwar

CA Final

View Details
Company
23 October 2026
Sr. Accountant

SANKARAN & KRISHNAN

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 22 October 2026
Articleship intern

Srinath Manikanta

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details