LAW Judgements

Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Rajiv Chavan, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a), 1(c), 2, 3 and 4; and Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(b), 5 and 6.

Heard Mr.Ashwin Gopakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.Anil C. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General for respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 6 to 11; and Mr.Prathamesh Kamat, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee has approached under the 'Vivad se Vishwas' scheme and Form 3 under the scheme has been issued. He, therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo in this re

23.02.2021: Resolution Professional of ‘M/s. Horizon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.’(Corporate Debtor undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP))is aggrieved of declining of his prayer in terms of the impugned order dated 3rdFebruary, 2021 for exc

The central issue in this appeal is in reference to Section 31of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 19731. To wit,transaction (specified in Section 31 of the 1973 Act) entered into incontravention of that provision is void or is only voidable and

The present Civil Appeal has been filed assailing the Judgment and Order dated 22.07.2014 passed by the Bombay High Court in Appeal No. 558 / 2007 dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants against the Consent Order dated 16.02.2005 in Suit No. 133

All these appeals pertain to an exemption provision containedin the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975. Under Section 3(1)(b) buildingsthat are used principally for religious, charitable or educational purposes or as factories or workshops are exempted fr

Steel products were supplied by the respondent to one M/s.Diamond Engineering Pvt. Ltd. [“the company”] from 21.09.2015 to11.11.2016, as a result of which INR 24,20,91,054/- was due and payableby the company. As many as 51 cheques were issued by the

This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 07.02.2020, as corrected by order dated 21.09.2020, by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal [“NCLAT”]. The Appellant is an operational creditor of Respondent No.2 herein – M/s. Shree Ram Urban Infra

The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the refund rejection orders. Noticing that W.P.No.13633/2020 relates to rejection of refund order as regards October, 2018;