The settlement which is recorded in terms of the decree by way of impugned order is between the parties to the consent terms, says SC

Author
View profile
Last updated: 10 March 2021
Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has ruled that a settlement, even if recorded by a court order, is only binding on the parties who actually signed the consent terms. This appeal concerned a property dispute where the appellants were not signatories to the consent order that was later upheld by the Bombay High Court. The court clarified that the consent order's effect is limited to those who agreed to it.

Court :
Supreme Court of India

Brief :
The present Civil Appeal has been filed assailing the Judgment and Order dated 22.07.2014 passed by the Bombay High Court in Appeal No. 558 / 2007 dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants against the Consent Order dated 16.02.2005 in Suit No. 1335 / 1988 to which the appellants are not the signatory to the proceedings.

Citation :
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 946 OF 2016

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694

 


Guest

Judgement posted by

Guest

View Judgements
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. No Fresh Pre-Deposit for GSTAT Appeal When Earlier Deposit Already Covers 20% of Disputed Tax
  2. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  3. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  4. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  5. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  6. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  7. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  8. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  9. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  10. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member SandhyaSandhyaPro Member Prakash MistryPrakash MistryPro Member Jeegar ValeraJeegar ValeraPro Member Chaitanya VoollaChaitanya VoollaPro Member SameerSameer
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 October 2026
Articled Assistant

RRPM & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 07 November 2026
Paid Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 November 2026
Articleship Assistant

B Thejas and Associates

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
12 November 2026
Auditor

Oz Taxation

Vijayawada

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 31 October 2026
CA Articleship

apricus india

Navi Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
13 November 2026
Chartered Accountant - Fresher

Neeraj Bhagat & Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details