Actual service providers (and not ports) are eligible for SEIS benefit in respect of their share of earnings, clarifies Bombay HC


Last updated: 17 March 2021

Court :
Bombay High Court

Brief :
Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Rajiv Chavan, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a), 1(c), 2, 3 and 4; and Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(b), 5 and 6.

Citation :
WRIT PETITION NO.1827 OF 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.

WRIT PETITION NO.1827 OF 2019

Atlantic Shipping Private Limited. .. Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents

Mr. Vikram Nankani, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Prithviraj
Choudhari, Mr. Santosh Jadhav and Ms. Preeti Shah for
Petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Chavan, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Priyanka Chavan for
Respondent Nos.1(a), 1(c), 2, 3 and 4.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. J. B. Mishra for
Respondent Nos.1(b), 5 and 6.

CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY 23, 2021.
PRONOUNCED ON : MARCH 09 , 2021.

JUDGMENT : (PER : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)

Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Rajiv Chavan, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a), 1(c), 2, 3 and 4; and Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(b), 5 and 6.

2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and 08/2018 dated21.06.2018 issued by respondent No.3 i.e. Joint Director General ofForeign Trade clarifying determination of eligibility of service providers for Service Exports from India Scheme (for short "SEIS") to claimbenefit to the extent of free foreign exchange earnings (or INRpayments as allowed under the scheme) routed through them asreceipt of service charges. Petitioner has also challenged refusalorder dated 25.10.2018 and consequential show cause notice dated10.05.2019 issued by respondent No.4 i.e. Zonal Additional DirectorGeneral of Foreign Trade, Mumbai and show cause notice dated30.05.2019 issued by respondent No.6 i.e. Additional Director General of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai Zonal Unit, Chennai.

3. Before we advert to the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, it will be apposite to briefly refer to the relevant facts as pleaded:

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

CCI Pro

Guest
Published in LAW
Views : 119
Attached File : 40_3439_wp18272019.pdf
downloaded 172 times

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details