Tax Consultant
1559 Points
Posted on 28 March 2012
Mr.V DCVS
You have not clearly mentioned the staus of the tenant. Stauts means here whether the tenenta is -
(i) An Individual
(ii) A Hindu Undivided Family
(iii) A Company
(iv) a firm (Partnership Firm)
(v) An Associaton Of Persons (AOP) or a Body of Individuals (BOI) - Socieities or Trusts, Associations Etc.,
(vi) A Local Authority
(vii) Every Artificial juridical Person, not falling wihin any of the preceding sub-clauses.
I presume on reading your question that you are of the opinion that your tenent is an Individual or a HUF whose accounts were not subjected to Audit u/s 44AB of Income-tax Act, 1961in the earlier year. If your opinion is correct there is no need to deduct tax at source for the year under consideration.
Though if your tenent is an Individual or a HUF whose accounts were subjected to audit u/s 44AB of Income-tax Act, 1961 for the earlier year your tenent is under legal obligation to deduct tax at source.
If your tenent is not an Individual or a HUF that person (please do not misunderstand the word person to be an Individual) here person means a Firm (Partnership Firm), A Company etc., as explained above is under legal obligation to deduct tax at source though the accounts of such tenent were not subjected to audit u/s 44AB in the earlier year.
If your tenent is under obligation to deduct tax at source and if fails to deduct the tax at source before the end of the financial year and deposit the same to the credit of Government the expenditure incurred by your tenent towards rent will not be an admissible expenditure.
Your tenent will have to pay interest on the amount of TDS if your tenet is under obligation to deduct tax at source for the reason your tenent has failed to deduct tax at source and deposit the same to the credit of Government as expalined by Mr.Bhanu Prakash.M.
Best Wishes
Sathikonda