I THINK THE BEST SOLUTION IS THAT THE AUDITS OF LISTED COMPANIES BE ALLOTED BY CENTRAL GOVERNEMNT OR SEBI OR C & AG LIKE PSU AUDITS .....THIS WILL ENSURE INDEPENDENCE OF AUDITORS .
YOUR OPINION PLEASE!
Menu
SOLUTION TO SATYAM FIASCO
Replies (7)
Yes
It will be better for appointment by CAG for maximum 3 years per firm by CAG.
Fraud cannot be deterred with mere pecuniary and criminal punishments and the deterance should be a social one which is in absentia.
The logic behind the same is that if say an individual does a fraud of Rs. 10000 the maxiumum jail term is 10 years and also for a fraud tuning to 100000000000000000000……and so on.
What we really need is a society that banishes fraudsters on a social ground?
Let's Hope that Govt create more employment oppurtunities for CA.
WHO IS SURE THAT IT WILL NOT HAPPEN UNDER CA SELECTED BY CAG.
If SEBI or any other Authority starts allocating audit, in all probability it will only result in back door entry by the auditor.
In my view its high time we have an audit governing structure like the US, the UK or even in Canada. But that again does not guarantee a clean audit.
Ethics is sadly missing in governance.
Audit shuld be very hard and productive
I think more power should be given to the CA's ....... for big companies, make CA's the internal part of management and specially for financial decisions......and with that more accountability should be added to CA's
Recent Topic
- Rent from redevelopment property
- How to find FMV of inherited gold after selling it
- Happy CA Day!!
- Share your proudest CA moment 🏆
- Gift recd from brother
- How to show Loan write off in DPT 3?
- Form 10E and Salary arrear
- LTCG U/S 54F. Sale of property plus sale of share
- Issue with ITR2 online utility for HUF
- TDS deducted by EPFO under wrong section
Related Topics
CAclubindia
