Result analysis may 2011

1100 views 1 replies

 

Hi Friends,

So we all are appearing for our Chartered Accoutancy Exams now, Right, We prepare really hard for it, well almost of us do… The institute screws us through these 15 days and want us to be perfect in all the areas of concern…. Correct me if I am wrong….?

Then my question to the Institue is why can’t it be perfect….?

Here is just a simple analysis of the data…. Some of which is taken from the institue website while some is taken from our CA Club India…

My analysis in short – If institue would have checked properly atleast 10000 students would have some different marks…

Here are the supportings…

This is data is taken from ICAI website:

 

% change Found

Total Applied

Applied and No Change

Total Change Found

Change in Marks Found

But Not Clear

Exemption

Passed

PCE

6.55%

5,804

5,424

380

302

14

64

IPCE

6.43%

8,431

7,889

542

442

25

75

Final

8.06%

14,409

13,248

1,161

977

55

129

   

28,644

26,561

2,083

1,721

94

268

 

This data is taken from CA Club india – the reason being I could not find this data on the ICAI Website… (Note: If actual data is different than this then the observation may change)

 

Appeared

Passed

Failed

PCE

91,420

26,699

64,721

IPCC

1,79,628

51,986

1,27,642

CA Final

1,34,733

38,628

96,105

 

Now a little bit of assumption…

 

Total No. OF Students Not applied for Verification

% Change Found (% of actual data)

Students that can expect change in marks

PCE

58,917

6.55%

3,857

IPCE

1,19,211

6.43%

7,664

Final

81,696

8.06%

6,583

 

2,59,824

 

18,104

 

Now you will say that out of this there are many-many students who have not studied well and appeared, so they deserve to fail – for instance let us take their percentage as 50%... fine with that… (However, I would just like to point that my analysis is not about who studies and who not but can there be just change in marks if institute would have correctly calculated them…)

So more 9552 students are cut….

Then the total number of students that could expect the change in marks is as follows:

Actual Change in Marks

    2,083

Change in Marks based on Assumption

    9,052

Total

 11,135

 

Although when you compare it to % of total appeared it comes down something around 2.75%...

But certainly 11 thousand is not small figure for institue to make mistakes… what say…?

Correct me if I am wrong…


Attached File : 124593 862437 result analysis.pdf downloaded: 208 times
Replies (1)

THANKS FOR SHARING

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 31 May 2026
Article Assistant

KPRS And Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 09 June 2026
Article Trainee

Numbertree LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
27 May 2026
Audit Assitant

Virender K Gupta and Co

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details