Query on scenario related to FAST DS 2026

My close relative has received SMS for "Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers - Disclosure Scheme, 2026 (FAST - DS)" couple of days back.

He was at onsite in below locations:
Country 1: Dec 2014 - Oct 2016
Country 2: Nov 2017 - Oct 2018

During these periods, he had received salary in his foreign bank accounts which he had transferred to his Indian account over a period of time.

As per AI, his resident status for those years is as below:
2014-15 : resident
2015-16 : non-resident
2016-17 : resident
2017-18 : resident
2018-19 : resident

He never declared foreign assets in Schedule FA. Also, except for 1 year, he never declared his foreign income in ITR. Even for that 1 year, he think he had declared incorrectly.

His 2 foreign accounts for country 1 and 2 respectively might be still active but with almost 0 balance since 2019.
He checked in AIS portal and can see his Country 2's bank account listed for CY 2022. Nothing for CY 2023 and 2024 yet.

He did his own research so far and feels like he is in a really bad situation.
1. If he go for Fast DS then, he need to pay heavy penalty of 60% of total undisclosed foreign income. Suppose total income for all those years is 50 lakhs(just example not calculated yet) then he will have to cough up 30 lakh in penalty.
2. If he doesn't go for Fast DS then he might risk even heavier penalty under BMA and possible litigation in ITAT or courts whenever they send SCN.

He is really frustrated with all this because it was never his intention to not disclose foreign salary. In fact, he could have claimed FTC on it.
People didn't had as much awareness or resources way back than we have now like AI, etc.

All of it is white money, earned through proper work. It feels so sad that Govt. wants to penalize people so hard by takng 60% of it.
This is not at all logical. How can they penalize genuine hard working people like this and call it Amnesty? They should allow people to disclose it now without any fees(or minimal charges).

After reading several online posts, it feels like there are diff. perspectives as below:
1. Govt is actually allowing us to disclose with less penalty so it's a better option than facing heavier penalty later.

2. Several ITAT verdicts similar to his(and other scenarios as well) have gone in favor of individuals due to DTAA. It feels like Govt. might be trying to spread fear to collect more money quickly. It might be better to fight this in tribunal later if required but it will involve lawyer's cost.
Some examples:
Kapil Gupta - India - Australia DTAA, Articale 5, Delhi
Manikandan Rajapacklaeswaran v. ACIT - Channai ITAT, 24 oct 2025

3. Wait and see if Govt. further clarifies on the doubts regarding Fast DS. Lets not hurry in availing this scheme.


Just looking for inputs and guidance from you all as what he should be doing now and what penalty he might have to face.


Thanks in advance!

Replies (4)
Quick Summary
This discussion concerns a query about the Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers - Disclosure Scheme, 2026 (FAST DS). The individual received SMS regarding the scheme due to undeclared foreign salary income earned while working abroad. They are seeking guidance on whether to opt for the FAST DS, facing a potential 60% penalty, or risk heavier penalties and litigation by not disclosing. The discussion also explores the potential protection offered by Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) and judicial precedents for genuine salary income.

In short, because the foreign income represents bona fide salary earned for services rendered abroad during overseas deputations, it is protected under Article 15 of the respective DTAAs and does not constitute unaccounted black money. While non-declaration of the foreign bank accounts in Schedule FA for ROR years represents a procedural oversight, judicial precedents consistently protect genuine salaried employees from harsh penalties where no tax evasion occurred. The taxpayer should audit their exact day counts for residential status, compile foreign tax and bank records, submit an explanatory response on the compliance portal, and consult an international tax professional before rushing into paying heavy penalties under the disclosure scheme.

In short, because the foreign income represents bona fide salary earned for services rendered abroad during overseas deputations, it is protected under Article 15 of the respective DTAAs and does not constitute unaccounted black money. While non-declaration of the foreign bank accounts in Schedule FA for ROR years represents a procedural oversight, judicial precedents consistently protect genuine salaried employees from harsh penalties where no tax evasion occurred. The taxpayer should audit their exact day counts for residential status, compile foreign tax and bank records, submit an explanatory response on the compliance portal, and consult an international tax professional before rushing into paying heavy penalties under the disclosure scheme.

Please do not decide this on the 60% figure yet. It applies to only one of the two routes, and the answer depends on the residential status for each year.

Step 1: fix the status year by year from actual days in India (Section 6 tests), not from an AI summary. The list in the post looks mixed, and a wrong year changes the whole result.

Step 2: split the years.
- Years where he was a non resident: salary for work done abroad was not taxable in India, and Schedule FA is not needed for those years. Nothing to declare.
- Years where he was resident: foreign salary was taxable in India (tax actually paid abroad can be set off under the DTAA route), and any foreign account held in the calendar year belonged in Schedule FA.

Step 3: the scheme has two routes. Assets or income that were already taxed in India, or earned while non resident, go into the flat fee route with an Rs 1 lakh fee. Foreign income that was never offered to tax here goes into the 60% route (30% tax plus an equal amount). The residents years where salary was never declared are the ones to look at closely. Check in the scheme rules whether the 60% is worked out on the income or on the value of the asset as on 31 March 2026. For accounts with almost nil balance since 2019 that difference is big.

The last date for the declaration is 31 December 2026, so there is time to do the residential status work properly, but I would not leave it open ended. Waiting for a tribunal fight later means years of cost and no certainty.

The [FAST-DS 2026 guide](https://taxgarden.in/blog/fast-ds-2026-foreign-assets-disclosure-scheme-small-taxpayers-india) sets out both routes, the forms, and the payment steps.

Have you checked what he said ? There are something beyond resident or non resident which is DTAA and no not every resident is chargeable to tax in India as per article 16 ( the employment article ) of DTAA. Check Rajat Dhara , Somnath Dattagupta , Manikandan , Gathya , Kapil Gupta , Pooja bhat , Sachin Saxena cases in ITAT . By virtue of article 16(1) and ITA section 90(2) an assesse even if resident not chargable to tax in India . DTAA overrides ITA . For this kind of advice people are wrongfully loosing money and living in fear.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Finance

I-Genext Consulting Private Limited

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
06 October 2026
Assistant Manager - Audit and Compliance

Ravi K Jain & Co

Noida

Others

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
13 October 2026
Accountant

Zerdi & Co. Chartered Accountants

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
15 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Continental Belting Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details