GST Payment through DRC-03 by cash against notice issued ASMT-10 for Excess claimed ITC in 3B

My client’s accountant made a payment dated 03‑05‑2026 through Form DRC‑03 against notice ASMT‑10 for excess ITC claimed in GSTR‑3B for April 2022 (F.Y. 2022‑23). However, upon reconciliation of GSTR‑2A, it was found that the suppliers’ invoices for April 2022 had been uploaded before the due date of 11th May 2022. The GST input was not reflected in GSTR‑2B for the relevant month due to technical glitches on the GST portal, resulting in mismatches. Since the invoices are duly appearing in GSTR‑2A, the question arises whether the payment made through DRC‑03 can be claimed/refunded.

 

Replies (2)
Quick Summary
If cash was paid through DRC-03 due to an ASMT-10 notice but the ITC was actually eligible and reflected in GSTR-2A, do not reclaim it in GSTR-3B. File ASMT-11 with supporting evidence and apply for a refund through RFD-01. Include reconciliation, timelines and relevant CBIC guidance.

Do not try to re-claim the credit in the next GSTR-3B, as this will trigger another system mismatch flag. Submit Form ASMT-11 to contest the notice on merits using GSTR-2A data, and file Form RFD-01 to get back the cash mistakenly paid via DRC-03.

Adding to Aashok's point on the ASMT-11/RFD-01 route - when you draft the ASMT-11 reply itself, walk through the timeline explicitly: invoice uploaded by supplier before 11 May 2022, GSTR-2A reflecting it correctly, and GSTR-2B missing it due to the portal glitch (a known, documented issue for that period, so cite it plainly rather than just asserting it). Attach the GSTR-2A extract and a reconciliation statement showing the ITC was genuinely available in that period, just not reflected in 2B due to a system error, not because it wasn't eligible.

 

Reference Section 16(2) and the relevant CBIC circulars/advisories on GSTR-2A vs 2B mismatches from technical glitches - officers do accept these when documented properly, since it's a recurring, acknowledged problem. Don't leave the ASMT-11 as a bare denial; the more it reads like a point-by-point rebuttal with dates and citations, the less likely it escalates to a DRC-01.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accountant

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
Article Assistant

MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA / CA Inter - 2 Groups Cleared

Getmyca Consultant Pvt Ltd

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 21 September 2026
CA Article Assistant

KK & Company Chartered Accountant

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 21 September 2026
Consultant - Reporting

Finrep Advisors LLP

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

MBA

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Audit Executive

Thammana & Associates

Srikakulam

B.Com

View Details