Doubt regarding the purpose of Section 52(3) of Companies Act, 2013

**52**. Application of premiums received on issue of shares.—(1) Where a company issues shares at a
premium, whether for cash or otherwise, a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the premium received on
those shares shall be transferred to a “securities premium account” and the provisions of this Act relating
to reduction of share capital of a company shall, except as provided in this section, apply as if the securities
premium account were the paid-up share capital of the company.

**(2)** Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the securities premium account may be
applied by the company—

(a) towards the issue of unissued shares of the company to the members of the company as fully
paid bonus shares;

(b) in writing off the preliminary expenses of the company;

(c) in writing off the expenses of, or the commission paid or discount allowed on, any issue of
shares or debentures of the company;

(d) in providing for the premium payable on the redemption of any redeemable preference shares
or of any debentures of the company; or

(e) for the purchase of its own shares or other securities under section 68.

**(3)** The securities premium account may, notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and
(2), be applied by such class of companies, as may be prescribed and whose financial statement comply
with the accounting standards prescribed for such class of companies under section 133,—

(a) in paying up unissued equity shares of the company to be issued to members of the company as
fully paid bonus shares; or

(b) in writing off the expenses of or the commission paid or discount allowed on any issue of equity
shares of the company; or

(c) for the purchase of its own shares or other securities under section 68.

 

 

 

 

Section 52(3) appears to allow the same uses of Securities Premium Account that are already permitted under Section 52(2). What is the practical difference between Section 52(2) and 52(3)? If a company satisfies Section 52(3) conditions, what additional benefit does it get compared to a company covered only by Section 52(2)?

Replies (2)
Quick Summary
This discussion explores the purpose and practical application of Section 52(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, concerning the use of the securities premium account. While Section 52(2) outlines general permitted uses for all companies, Section 52(3) offers additional flexibility for specific classes of companies that meet certain financial statement and accounting standard requirements. The core question is what distinct advantages or actions a company satisfying Section 52(3) can take with its securities premium account that a company under Section 52(2) cannot, with a request for a practical example to clarify this distinction.

Section 52(2) serves as the default, exhaustive list of permitted uses for all companies, focusing on capital preservation. Section 52(3) provides a layer of regulatory flexibility for specific classes of companies, allowing them to utilize the SPA in alignment with prescribed Accounting Standards, ensuring that complex financial reporting requirements do not conflict with the statutory restrictions on capital reserves.

Sorry if this is a very basic question, but I come from a non commerce background and I am not very familiar with this technical language.

Thank you for the explanation. However, my doubt still remains :

For example, if Company A satisfies the conditions under Section 52(3) and Company B does not, what specific action can A perform using the SPA that B cannot?

A practical example would help me understand the purpose of Section 52(3).

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Follow