Menu
Cpt law problem
1. void as illegal as opposed to public policy.
2.C gets good title exception to "Nemo dat quod non habet" section 30(1)
yeah That is what I would also think when first looking at the question. But the law has to protect the rights of the C who bought the T.v. on good faith from B without knowing that it is already sold. It is given in the book as an exception to the rule that you can't give what you don't have. This is mentioned as section 31. A's recourse is to either sue B as breach of contract and claim damages and rescind the contract to get the money back or to claim specific performance. i.e. to get a similar T.v. for the pre-agreed price
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/904169/
CHAPTER IV PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT CHAPTER IV PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT
the law gives good title to C
TEJASWI IS RIGHT..BINGO
Recent Topic
- 194JB INCOME
- Filing ITR3 where income under section 44AD with L
- What is superannuation fund
- GST Refund of input services under Inverted Duty S
- Dividend Reporting
- Real operational bottlenecks after firms use Tally
- Purchase return under gst
- Long Term Capital Loss - cannot be carried forward
- Cross-utilization of ITC between Trading and Resta
- Form 121 eligibility for non deduction of TDS for
Related Topics
CAclubindia
