CA v MBA - the big fight

Others 2000 views 17 replies

 

CA Vs MBA

 

There has always been an ongoing debate in the Indian corporate world about who is a better professional out of a Chartered Accountant and a MBA. People have put forward various arguments in this context. Some say that an MBA being better equipped with skills such as presentation, communication, analytical etc turns out o be a better professional and others argue that a CA who is more thorough, intelligent and hard working is much better. But if the recent placements and campus recruitments etc are to be seen, MBAs turn out to be the winners. Further, the Indian Inc has over a period shown more liking towards them. They certainly have scored over the chartered accountants in this regard.

 

So shall we all start believing that MBAs are better than CAs....or they are Overrated.......??????????

 

I invite your comments in this subject.

 

Regards

 

Rupesh Kalantri

 

Replies (17)

CA is best... forget others....

Agreed....except in PAY......!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think we should believe in what we do and not lose hope

CA is far Better than MBA ...

you even see that MBA is just around the nook and corner .....MBA Gets higher wages only if they have the Tag of Big institutes ... Like IIM, FMS

CA is well-versed with accountancy , audit,tax, ... and even CA work upon their presentation skills .

 

 

 

 

CA is the best...............................................

I think CA are better

ICAI has to implement some programmes to improve communication and writting skill of the students

I think writting and communication skill is very essential in today's corporate world

I agree that student of metro cities are good in that but students from villages and small citiies are not so good.

Others comments are welcome......

 

Regards

Sachin

I agree with Renu

I feel CA is better:

1. MBAs cannot audit.

2. MBAs are not involved in advanced tax planning

3. MBAs cannot practice their profession

4. MBAs dont undergo 'ARTICLESHIP'

5. MBAs dont repeat all subjects if they fail in 1

6. Only IIMites earn crores, others are less coz brand matters.

Originally posted by : Ashok J

I feel CA is better:

1. MBAs cannot audit.

2. MBAs are not involved in advanced tax planning

3. MBAs cannot practice their profession

4. MBAs dont undergo 'ARTICLESHIP'

5. MBAs dont repeat all subjects if they fail in 1

6. Only IIMites earn crores, others are less coz brand matters.

I agree with Renu.....

CAs are far better than MBA counterparts.....ICAI had already done & can do a lot more to ensure that CAs remain the first choice of the industry.

ICAI should incorporate a few changes in the syllabus at the final level

 

1. Instead of 100 marks for ISCA , it should be 50 - 50 for ISCA and Strategic Mgt. 

2. Adv. Mgt. Accounting should be some portion of General Mgt. skills and recent management developments and tools. This could be done by eliminating few redundant chapters in costing.

 

Further, more programmes should be introduced for Communication & Presentation Skills, Student - Indutry interface and the likes.

No doubt that CA is far better than MBA...if you are dedicated to THIS PROFESSION  even a MBA from IIM can not beat because we have a advantage of learning for 3 year ......when we can get so much of exposure......

 

so i believe CA is far better than MBA

 

DONT DOUBT OUR PROFESSION

Dear All ,

This post of mine is not being made with an intention of   offending  the views of many people here but before arriving at a conclusion , Lets play a game of breaking it down based on the nature of the question asked.

1.Its very obivious that in a forum like a caclubindia.com , the answer will be a biased answer with people inclining towards CA. There are no two ways about it . I can definetely say for sure that atleast 99 % of the people would say CA is a better course .

The reasons are quite obivious . The main reason that they would side with CA is that the people feel that the time invested in towards acquiring the professional qualification is high thereby enabling them to earn the tag of being superior to a M.B.A graduate . So though the question is appropriate , Addressing this in a forum which is dominated by CA's in my view is not appropriate. 

The mistake often made by Chartered Accountants is that they feel that Articleship is a very valuable experience . In reality it is not ,unless when the same is pursued in either the big firms or firms which essentially have a lot of top clients for you to end up doing quality work.

Even if you are doing articleship in a reasonably good sized firm , It is usually the partner and the senior manager who does the strategy work .To say that the Article Clerk does strategy work is a bit inappropriate in my view . Yes the article clerk  does undergo hardships but it does not  give a competitive edge in terms of learning.

 

2. To think that Financial Statements are the start and end of everything is again not correct and people are essentially fooling themselves by thinking so . Its very essential to know that Finance is a concept which extends beyond the terms of Accountancy and Book Keeping . I will definetely say that Financial Statements are an integral part because it is a reflection of the Company's Financial Position but its aspects like  Budgeting , Forecasting , Understanding the processes and the Nature of the Business  are definetely the  key drivers which translate into results and profits

CA's think that the ability to understand complicated legal jargons give them an edge but in reality what is needed is  the ability to translate , interpret and communicate the results in a simple language

3.To say that Management Professionals cannot practice their profession is an absolute fallacy . There are several people who start venture capitalist firms and other strategic consultancies using their insights achieved through their interactions with top industrial experts .

4.Lastly to be fair to the M.B.A candidates WHILE MAKING COMPARISONS . DONT BE AFRAID TO MAKE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST . WHEN YOU OBTAIN A PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION FROM THE ONLY PREMIER ACCOUNTING BODY IN INDIA WHICH IS ICAI . YOU HAVE TO MAKE COMPARISONS WITH THE MBA'S OBTAINED ONLY FROM THE TOP B SCHOOLS WHICH ARE ESSENTIALLY IN THE TOP 10  LIST. DONT BOTHER MAKING COMPARISONS WITH INSTITUTES OUTSIDE THE TOP 10 BECAUSE THE LOGIC IS FLAWED WITH MAKING COMPARISONS.

5.Check out the student profiles of the top B-Schools . You will be surprised to know that many CA's working in top firms in respectable levels apply to get insights on strategic leadership and other soft skills to get a competitive edge and most definetely a fatter pay packet

The key thing to remember is CA is a good base qualification but to think that it equips you with all the facets required to thrive completely is not appropriate .

Focus on doing the job well and try to succeed in whatever you do . The profession is not what makes you but is what you make of it ultimately

 

@ naren

though articleship from small firms do not provide that much of expirience but that does not mean this happens with everyone

 

in CA profession we ourselves need to learn things...its us who need  to be aware and curious to know nd learn..

 

infact its useless to argue over it that which profession is better...all professional cources have something special in them...

and if its about communication skills you pay alot for obtaining a MBA degree ...and few lil for CA...if you want to improve your skill them pay to some private institute and improve it.

no one can stop anyone from getting knowledge...this completely depends on us..how we take it..

 

 

I thought...... "MBA is like 2nd class food with no taste served in charming golden plates... on the other hand CA is ist class testy food attract to people even served in general plate.." Todays is the time of showoff.... but it can b for a limited period. Now U can understand that MBA cannot beat CA..


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Related Threads
Loading