Any Relief Measure for Show casue Notice based on Section 16(4) ?

HI,

Are there any relief measures in favour of the taxpayer who has received notice for the FY 2019-20 i.r.t 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017?

The taxpayer has filed GSTR3Bs, for the FY 2019-20, in August 2021.

Please guide if there are any case laws/circulars/notifications in favour of taxpayer.

Thanks in advance.

Replies (4)
Quick Summary
This discussion addresses relief measures for taxpayers facing show cause notices under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, particularly when GSTR-3Bs were filed late for FY 2019-20. While direct relief at the initial stage is unlikely, the advice suggests filing an appeal and potentially referencing High Court judgments. Key cases mentioned include 'Aap & Company' and 'Tvl. Kavin HP Gas Gramin Vitrak', which highlight GSTR-3B as a temporary measure and the prejudice to assessees when ITC is denied without an enabling mechanism. A recent Kerala High Court judgment regarding a retrospective extension is also noted.

Hello,

The case under Section 16(4) will not be dropped at the initial level. You will need to file an appeal and go to the High Court. For your case, I suggest that you can take the plea of COVID-19 and I also suggest some judgments that you can refer to.

*1* judgement of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of "Aap & Company, Chartered Accountants Through Authorized Partners vs. Union of India, [R/Special Civil Application No. 18962 of 2018]".
It is clear from the judgement that GSTR-3B was a temporary arrangement introduced to alleviate the burden on taxpayers due to technical glitches in the GSTN portal. It was not intended as a substitute for GSTR-3. The Government's subsequent notifications extending the due date of filing GSTR-3 and the retrospective amendment to recognize GSTR-3B as a return under Section 39 were not in line with the original legislative intent.

*2* judgment in the case of Tvl. Kavin HP Gas Gramin Vitrak vs. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, bearing WP(MD) Nos. 7173 and 7174 of 2023 and WMP(MD) Nos. 6764 and 6765 of 2023, the Hon’ble Madras High Court held that in the absence of any enabling mechanism, the assessee cannot be prejudiced by not granting ITC.

Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017 – A Critical Analysis CA (Dr) Ayush Saraf, Guwahati ON  20 May 2023 
 

Recent kerala high.court judgement trade link vs union of india
In Kerala h c 2 months extn given retrospectively. 30 nov.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
12 October 2026
AUDIT , ACCOUNTS AND TAXATION

KDSS

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 28 October 2026
CA- Inter and Articles

N N V Satish & Co.,

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 October 2026
CA Industrial Trainee

Fytomax Nutrition Private Limited

Aurangabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
Asst. Manager/Dy Manager (Costing)

manufacturing

Pune

CMA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 October 2026
Article Assistant (CA Inter / CMA Inter) - Thrissur

Varma Raja & Associates

Thrissur

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 October 2026
Article assistants

Shyam S Gupta and Company

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 October 2026
Assistant Director/ Associate Director-Finance & Accounting

Krea University

Chennai

CA

View Details