This case study examines whether dividend distribution tax under Section 115-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be levied on dividends declared from agricultural income. It details a tea company's argument that taxing such dividends infringes on state legislative powers. The Supreme Court's observations clarify that dividend income is derived from investment, not the original source, and thus is taxable by the Union Parliament. The study concludes that dividend distribution tax is applicable to the full dividend amount declared by companies, even those with agricultural activities, though it notes DDT has since been abolished.