The Supreme Court, in a significant ruling on the scope of tax deductions available to statutory corporations, has held that the 40% deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act can be claimed only on profits directly earned from providing long-term finance. Income generated from activities such as dividends, short-term deposits, or service charges does not qualify for the benefit, the Court clarified.
A Bench comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Atul S. Chandurkar dismissed an appeal filed by the National Cooperative Development Corporation (NCDC), observing that the deduction is strictly linked to loans or advances repayable over a period of five years or more. The Court rejected NCDC's argument that income from dividends, interest, and service charges formed part of its "integrated business" of cooperative development financing.

Emphasising the legislative intent behind Section 36(1)(viii), the Bench noted that the provision was designed to incentivise the specific activity of providing long-term credit for industrial, agricultural, or infrastructure development. Accepting a broader interpretation, the Court warned, would encourage statutory corporations to park surplus funds in low-risk, short-term investments while still claiming substantial tax benefits, contrary to their statutory mandate.
Justice Chandurkar, who authored the judgment, reiterated that tax deductions must be construed strictly. The Court outlined three essential conditions for claiming the deduction: the income must be "derived from" long-term financing in a narrow sense, there must be a direct and immediate nexus with that activity and the benefit is confined to income from first-degree sources, excluding ancillary or incidental profits.
Upholding the findings of the assessing officer, the CIT(A), the ITAT, and the High Court, the Supreme Court concluded that NCDC's earnings from short-term deposits and service activities lacked a direct connection with its core long-term lending operations. As a result, such income was held to be ordinary business income, not eligible for the 40 per cent deduction under Section 36(1)(viii).
