Patna HC Penalizes GST Officer Rs 5K for Illegal Recovery



Quick Summary
The Patna High Court has fined a GST officer £5,000 for illegally recovering the full tax amount from National Insurance Company's regional office. This occurred despite the company having made a statutory deposit while awaiting a functional GST tribunal. The court has ordered the refund of the unlawfully recovered £42 crore within two weeks.

Introduction The Patna High Court has imposed a penalty of Rs 5,000 on a Goods and Services Tax (GST) officer for engaging in forcible and illegal recovery of the entire tax amount from an individual awaiting the statutory remedy of appeal before the non-functional GST tribunal in Bihar. The court, presided over by Chief Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice Rajiv Roy, issued the order on Thursday while granting relief to the National Insurance Companys Patna regional office. The court further
Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited News Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN - Rs.1999
1799
(Excl. of GST ₹323)

2 Years PLAN - Rs.3499
3149
(Excl. of GST ₹566)

BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN - Rs.4999
4499
(Excl. of GST ₹809)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694

FAQ :

The GST officer was penalised for engaging in 'forcible and illegal recovery' of the entire tax amount from an individual, even though statutory remedies were pending.

The penalty imposed on the GST officer was £5,000.

The total amount of tax recovered illegally was approximately £42 crore.

The court has directed the state commercial taxes department to refund the unlawfully recovered tax amount within a fortnight (two weeks).

The GST tribunal in Bihar is currently non-functional, which has led to challenges for assessees. The court had previously allowed a 20% deposit in lieu of the tribunal being operational.

The case highlights the challenges due to the absence of a functional GST tribunal and underscores the need for fair and lawful tax recovery procedures, setting a precedent against coercive measures by tax officials.




News posted by

Finance news reporter covering taxation, GST, income tax, business compliance, and economy updates. I simplify complex financial topics into easy-to-understand articles for professionals, taxpayers, and business owners on leading finance and tax platforms.

Comments :


More »

Popular News





CCI Pro



Company
24 October 2026
CA Industrial Trainee

Fytomax Nutrition Private Limited

Aurangabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
Featured 07 November 2026
Chartered Accountant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 October 2026
Article Intern (CA Articleship)

Arpan Bohra & Co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 31 October 2026
CA Articleship

apricus india

Navi Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 October 2026
semi-qualified CA

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 November 2026
Article Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 October 2026
Assistant Director/ Associate Director-Finance & Accounting

Krea University

Chennai

CA

View Details