Patna HC Penalizes GST Officer Rs 5K for Illegal Recovery



Quick Summary
The Patna High Court has fined a GST officer £5,000 for illegally recovering the full tax amount from National Insurance Company's regional office. This occurred despite the company having made a statutory deposit while awaiting a functional GST tribunal. The court has ordered the refund of the unlawfully recovered £42 crore within two weeks.

Introduction The Patna High Court has imposed a penalty of Rs 5,000 on a Goods and Services Tax (GST) officer for engaging in forcible and illegal recovery of the entire tax amount from an individual awaiting the statutory remedy of appeal before the non-functional GST tribunal in Bihar. The court, presided over by Chief Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice Rajiv Roy, issued the order on Thursday while granting relief to the National Insurance Companys Patna regional office. The court further
Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited News Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

FAQ :

The GST officer was penalised for engaging in 'forcible and illegal recovery' of the entire tax amount from an individual, even though statutory remedies were pending.

The penalty imposed on the GST officer was £5,000.

The total amount of tax recovered illegally was approximately £42 crore.

The court has directed the state commercial taxes department to refund the unlawfully recovered tax amount within a fortnight (two weeks).

The GST tribunal in Bihar is currently non-functional, which has led to challenges for assessees. The court had previously allowed a 20% deposit in lieu of the tribunal being operational.

The case highlights the challenges due to the absence of a functional GST tribunal and underscores the need for fair and lawful tax recovery procedures, setting a precedent against coercive measures by tax officials.




News posted by

Finance news reporter covering taxation, GST, income tax, business compliance, and economy updates. I simplify complex financial topics into easy-to-understand articles for professionals, taxpayers, and business owners on leading finance and tax platforms.

Comments :


More »


Popular News





CCI Pro



Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Semi-Qualified Assitant

Subrahmanyam & Sivudu CA Firm

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA / CA Inter - 2 Groups Cleared

Getmyca Consultant Pvt Ltd

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 11 September 2026
Audit Executive

RBSM Corporate Advisors Private Limited

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 August 2026
Article Assistant

RRPM & ASSOCIATES LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartared Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
18 September 2026
Accounts & Finance Specialist

ULTRA CHEMICAL WORKS

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
Article Assistant

MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY

Noida

CA Inter

View Details