Online gaming companies in limbo as GST authorities struggle to take action after Gameskraft probe



Quick Summary
Online gaming companies face an uncertain future as GST authorities are delayed in taking action. This follows a Karnataka High Court ruling that quashed a ₹21,000 crore notice to Gameskraft. The core issue revolves around whether online games are considered games of skill (18% GST) or games of chance (28% GST). The High Court affirmed that games like rummy, whether played online or physically, are games of skill and not gambling, a decision the government may appeal to the Supreme Court.

Dark clouds loom over the post-probe move against online gaming companies by GST Authorities after a ruling by Karnataka High Court in the Gameskraft matter. The government, in response to a question in Lok Sabha some time back, had given an estimate of tax evasion of around ₹23,000 crore by some gaming companies (including online gaming companies).

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) will initiate action against online gaming companies, based on its investigation, after the Karnataka High Court decides on a challenge petition filed by Bengaluru-based Gameskraft. Since the ruling has gone against Tax Department, so initiation of action against other companies is likely to be delayed. There are indications that Government may move to the Supreme Court against the High Court ruling. This means further action could depend upon apex court ruling.

GST Action on Online Gaming Delayed After Gameskraft Ruling

On May 11, the High Court quashed a show cause notice (SCN) of ₹21,000 crore issued to Gamescraft. The whole issue is about a game of skill vs a game of chance. While the industry says it is a game of skill to the GST rate would be 18 percent, the government calls it a game of chance and wants GST to be applicable at the rate of 28 percent.

In its ruling, the High Court said there is a distinct difference between games of skill and games of chance; games, such as rummy, etc., as was discussed in several decisions above and particularised in the Division Bench decision of this Court in All India Gaming Federation’s case whether played online or physical, with or without stakes would be games of skill and test of predominance would apply.

"Though Section 2(17) of the CGST Act recognises even wagering contracts as included in the term business, but that in itself would not mean that lottery, betting, and gambling are the same as games of skill," the Court said. Further, it added that a game of chance whether played with stakes is gambling and a game of skill whether played with stakes or without stakes is not gambling. Online/Electronic/Digital Rummy whether played with stakes or without stakes is not gambling. Other Online/Electronic/Digital games that are also substantially and preponderantly games of skill and not of chance are also not gambling, clarified the Court.

FAQ :

Action is delayed because the Karnataka High Court quashed a significant notice issued to Gameskraft, and GST authorities are awaiting further legal clarity, potentially from a Supreme Court ruling.

The Gameskraft case involved a ₹21,000 crore GST notice, with the dispute centering on whether online rummy is a game of skill or a game of chance.

The industry argues online games are games of skill, attracting an 18% GST. The government considers them games of chance, wanting a 28% GST rate.

The High Court ruled that games like rummy, played online or physically, are games of skill and not gambling, regardless of stakes involved.

There are indications that the government may appeal the High Court ruling to the Supreme Court, which could further impact future actions against gaming companies.




News posted by

Finance news reporter covering taxation, GST, income tax, business compliance, and economy updates. I simplify complex financial topics into easy-to-understand articles for professionals, taxpayers, and business owners on leading finance and tax platforms.

Comments :


More »


Popular News





CCI Pro