The Karnataka High Court has ordered the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to grant membership to a 23-year-old Chartered Accountant, Nikkitha KJ. The court rebuked the ICAI for attempting to penalise Nikkitha, who had obtained prior permission to pursue additional courses during her CA studies. Justice M Nagaprasanna stated that penalising a diligent student who followed due process was unjust and contrary to fairness.
Landmark Decision Upholds Students Right to Pursue Multiple Courses
Karnataka High Court has directed the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to grant membership to Nikkitha KJ, a 23-year-old practising Chartered Accountant from the city. The court criticized the Institutes decision to deny her membership despite obtaining prior permission for pursuing multiple courses during her CA studies.
Court Rebukes ICAIs Attempt to Stifle Students Career
Justice M Nagaprasanna,
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Karnataka High Court ordered the ICAI to grant membership to Nikkitha KJ, a Chartered Accountant who had pursued multiple courses.
The ICAI initially informed Nikkitha that she would face a two-year enrollment restriction and a fine for pursuing multiple courses, despite her having obtained prior permission.
Yes, Nikkitha KJ sought and was granted permission by the Institute to pursue the Company Secretary professional course on March 30, 2021.
The court strongly criticised the ICAI's decision, deeming it unjust and contrary to constitutional principles, as Nikkitha had diligently followed procedures and sought permissions.
This landmark decision sets a precedent, emphasising the importance of upholding students' rights and recognising their efforts to gain diverse skills, while reminding professional bodies to ensure fairness.