Quick Summary
The Bombay High Court on January 24, 2025, disposed of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Chamber of Tax Consultants concerning the eligibility of the rebate under Section 87A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench, comprising Justice M. S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain, ruled that
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited News Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The PIL was filed by the Chamber of Tax Consultants regarding the eligibility of taxpayers to claim the rebate under Section 87A of the Income Tax Act, particularly when the online utility initially prevented such claims.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the PIL on January 24, 2025.
The core issue was whether the Income Tax department was justified in modifying its online utility to block taxpayers from claiming the Section 87A rebate at the time of filing their returns.
The court ruled that the authorities under the Income Tax Act are responsible for assessing the eligibility of Section 87A rebate claims during the processing of tax returns.
Yes, the court indicated that assessees should not be prevented from making a claim, even if it's debatable, and such claims should be reviewed during the assessment process.
No, the court clarified that it refrained from judging the correctness of the arguments, stating that this is a matter for the quasi-judicial authorities to decide during the regular assessment process.
CAclubindia
