What is the period of limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?


Last updated: 17 March 2021

Court :
Supreme Court of India

Brief :
The present Appeals raise two important issues for our consideration : (i) the period of limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the 1996 Act”); and (ii) whether theCourt may refuse to make the reference under Section 11 where the claims are ex facie time-barred?

Citation :
CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 843-844 OF 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 843-844 OF 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1531-32/ 2021)

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. & ANR. …APPELLANTS

Versus

M/S NORTEL NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. …RESPONDENT

J U D G M E N T

INDU MALHOTRA, J.

Leave granted.

1. The present Appeals raise two important issues for our consideration : (i) the period of limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the 1996 Act”); and (ii) whether theCourt may refuse to make the reference under Section 11 where the claims are ex facie time-barred?

2. (a) The factual matrix in which the present issues have arisen for our consideration is the issuance of a tender notification by the AppellantCompany [hereinafter referred to as “BSNL”] inviting bids for planning, engineering, supply, insulation, testing and commissioning of GSM based cellular mobile network in the southern region covering the Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh Circles, and the Chennai telephone district. In the tender process, the Respondent-Company [hereinafter referred to as “Nortel”] was awarded the purchase order. On completion of the Works under the purchase order, BSNL deducted / withheld an amount of Rs.99,70,93,031 towards liquidated damages and other levies.

(b) Nortel vide communication dated 13.05.2014 raised a claim for payment of the said amount.

BSNL vide letter dated 04.08.2014 rejected the claim of Nortel.

(c) After a period of over 5 ½ years, Nortel vide letter dated 29.04.2020 invoked the arbitration clause, and requested for appointment of anindependent arbitrator, wherein it was contended that the dispute ofwithholding the aforesaid amounts, would fall within the ambit of arbitrable disputes under the agreement.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

CCI Pro

Guest
Published in LAW
Views : 163
downloaded 271 times

Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details