Shri. Suresh Linganagouda Patil, Bangalore The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle- 11(2), Bangalore

Last updated: 12 December 2020

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated21-08-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-1, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12.

Citation :
ITA No.2231/Bang/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.2231/Bang/2019
Assessment Year: 2011-12

Shri Suresh Linganagouda Patil
No.428, 16th Main
3rd Cross, 3rd Block
Koramangala
Bangalore-560 034
PAN NO : ACVPP9147Q
APPELLANT

Vs.

Deputy Commissioner of
Income-tax
Circle-11(2)
Bangalore
RESPONDENT

Appellant by : N O N E
Respondent by : Smt. R. Premi, D.R.
Date of Hearing : 07.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 07.12.2020

O R D E R

PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated21-08-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-1, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12.

2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the Ld Counsel for the assessee has furnished a letter stating that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and it is in progress.

3. The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has towithdraw the pending appeal after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad SeVishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish acopy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determinedby the tax official to the department. Accordingly she submitted thatthe appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as theassessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal. She submitted that the Bangalore bench of Tribunal is giving liberty to the assessee to seek recall of the order, if so warranted.

To know more in details find the attachment file

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok