CA Loan Bajaj Finserv
CA Final Online Classes
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ram Bhagat Yadav, Bahadurgarh ITO, Ward-5, Rohtak

LinkedIn


Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19th March, 2019 passed by the Ld. CIT (A)- Rohtak relating to assessment year 2015-16.

Citation :
ITA No. 3652/Del/2019

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “SMC-2”: NEW DELHI
(Through Video Conferencing)
 BEFORE
SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 3652/Del/2019
 Asstt. Year 2015-16

Ram Bhagat Yadav
Opp. BCCI, Part-B-MIE, Delhi
Road, Bahadurgarh
Haryana 124507
PAN AAPPY1074P
(Appellant) 

Vs. 

ITO
Ward -5
Rohtak.
(Respondent)

Assessee by: Shri Naveen Kumar Goyal, CA
Department by : Shri Farat Khan, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 03/02/2021
Date of pronouncement 03/02/2021

O R D E R

PER R.K. PANDA, AM
 
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19th March, 2019 passed by the Ld. CIT (A)- Rohtak relating to assessment year 2015-16.

2. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset submitted that the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and has filed the declaration in Form 1 and 2 and hasreceived Form 3 from the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. He accordingly requested that the appeal filed by the assessee may kindly allowed to be withdrawn. In absence of any objection from the side of the Ld. Sr. DR, the request of the assessee seeking withdrawal of the appeal is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
 
Order pronounced in the open court at time of hearing itself i.e. on 3rd February, 2021.

 sd/-
 (R.K. PANDA)
 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

 Dated: 03/02/2021
Veena

Copy forwarded to
1. Applicant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT (A)
5. DR:ITAT

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT, New Delhi 

 

 

Guest
on 09 February 2021
Published in Income Tax
Views : 27
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags
X

Do you have any Tax Queries

Submit