banner_ad

Providing loans to borrowers by the bank does not amount to service


Last updated: 24 August 2021

Court :
CESTAT, Delhi

Brief :
In State Bank of Patiala v. Commissioner, Central Excise & Central Goods & Services Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 52160 of 2019-SM dated August 9, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the Order-In-Appeal No. 392 (CRM) ST/JDR/2019 dated April 24, 2019('OIA') which upheld the Order-In-Original ('OIO') stating the Central Value Added Tax ('CENVAT') Credit on Input Service was wrongly availed by State Bank of Patiala ('the Appellant').

Citation :
Service Tax Appeal No. 52160 of 2019-SM dated August 9, 2021

In State Bank of Patiala v. Commissioner, Central Excise & Central Goods & Services Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 52160 of 2019-SM dated August 9, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the Order-In-Appeal No. 392 (CRM) ST/JDR/2019 dated April 24, 2019('OIA') which upheld the Order-In-Original ('OIO') stating the Central Value Added Tax ('CENVAT') Credit on Input Service was wrongly availed by State Bank of Patiala ('the Appellant').

The Revenue observed that the Appellants had availed CENVAT Credit on Input Services of 'Collateral Management charges' which provides services in relation to processing of loans and advances. Noted that, such input service is exclusively used for providing exempt services, in other words, service tax is not chargeable on the interest earned by the bank on loans/ advances. Therefore, the credit not being available on this service under Rule 6(1) read with Rule 6(5) and 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi observed that giving loans is not a service, but an activity of the Bank in which money, which is akin to goods, is given to the borrower. For the reason that interest earned by the Bank on loans is not liable to tax, the Show Cause Notice ('SCN') also alleged that giving of loan is an exempt service.

Further noted, that the SCN was issued after 32 months from the date of return was due, therefore the decision of the SCN for invoking the extended period of Limitation was bad in the eyes of law. No suppression of facts or contumacious conduct was observed from the side of Appellants.

Our Comments:

In GST regime Entry No. 27 of Notification 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 ('Services Exemption Notification') provides exemption to the following services-

 'Services by way of-

(a) extending deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by way of interest or discount (other than interest involved in credit card services);'

This implies that services by way of loan do come within the purview of supply, however, that has been considered as an 'exempted supply' in the Service Exemption Notification.

 

CCI Pro

Bimal Jain
Published in Excise
Views : 150

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details