Pawan Jain, Ghaziabad ITO ward-2(1), Ghaziabad

Last updated: 12 March 2021

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 06.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals], Ghaziabad, for Assessment Year 2010-11.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 7023/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
[ DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC–2’ NEW DELHI ]
BEFORE SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
A N D
MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
I.T.A. No. 7023/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Shri Pawan Jain,
R–2, 2nd Floor, Raj Kunj,
Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad,
Uttar Pradesh – 211 002.
PIN : AFBPJ6887N
(APPELLANT)

Vs.

Income Tax Officer,
Ward : 2 (1),
Ghaziabad.
(RESPONDENT)

Assessee by : Shri Vipin Garg, F.C.A.;
Department by : Shri Farat Khan, Sr. D. R.;

Date of Hearing 01.03.2021
Date of Pronouncement 01.03.2021

O R D E R

PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM :

This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 06.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals], Ghaziabad, for Assessment Year 2010-11.

2. When the matter is called up for hearing the ld AR of the assesseesubmitted a letter dated 26.02.2021 wherein, it is submitted that assessee hasalready opted for settlement of the dispute involved in this appeal under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by filing Form Nos. 1 and 2. Subsequently, Form No. 3 as per section 5(1) of the Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was also issued to the assessee by the Department.

3. The ld. DR also agreed with the above contentions.

4. In view of the above facts the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

To know more in details find the attachment file

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok