Pawan Jain, Ghaziabad ITO ward-2(1), Ghaziabad


Quick Summary
This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case concerns an appeal filed by the Revenue against an order for Shri Pawan Jain for the Assessment Year 2010-11. During the hearing, it was submitted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Both the assessee's representative and the Department's Senior Departmental Representative agreed with this submission. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 06.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals], Ghaziabad, for Assessment Year 2010-11.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 7023/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
[ DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC–2’ NEW DELHI ]
BEFORE SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
 A N D
MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
I.T.A. No. 7023/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

Shri Pawan Jain,
R–2, 2nd Floor, Raj Kunj,
Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad,
Uttar Pradesh – 211 002.
PIN : AFBPJ6887N
(APPELLANT)

Vs.

Income Tax Officer,
Ward : 2 (1),
Ghaziabad.
 (RESPONDENT)

Assessee by : Shri Vipin Garg, F.C.A.;
Department by : Shri Farat Khan, Sr. D. R.;

Date of Hearing 01.03.2021
Date of Pronouncement 01.03.2021

O R D E R

PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM :

This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 06.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals], Ghaziabad, for Assessment Year 2010-11.

2. When the matter is called up for hearing the ld AR of the assesseesubmitted a letter dated 26.02.2021 wherein, it is submitted that assessee hasalready opted for settlement of the dispute involved in this appeal under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by filing Form Nos. 1 and 2. Subsequently, Form No. 3 as per section 5(1) of the Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was also issued to the assessee by the Department.

3. The ld. DR also agreed with the above contentions.

4. In view of the above facts the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

FAQ :

The appeal was filed by the Revenue against an order concerning Shri Pawan Jain for the Assessment Year 2010-11.

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the assessee had opted for settlement under the Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

It is an act that allows taxpayers to settle disputes related to direct taxes.

This judgement relates to the Assessment Year 2010-11.

 
downloaded 289 times



Judgement posted by

Guest

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 06 October 2026
Semi Qualified

AJAY SINGH AND CO LLP

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
28 October 2026
Assistant Director/ Associate Director-Finance & Accounting

Krea University

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 October 2026
Articled Assistant

KPSN & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 October 2026
Article Intern (CA Articleship)

Arpan Bohra & Co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
SALES TELECALLER

HIRE NOVA

Lucknow

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details