Notification extending time limit not applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-18


Quick Summary
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a notification extending the time limit for passing orders under Section 73 of the CGST Act does not apply to financial year 2017-18. The court found that the original time limit for passing such orders had already expired before the notification came into effect. Consequently, the department's orders issued beyond the original deadline were quashed.

Court :
Allahabad High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. AV Pharma v. State of UP [Writ Tax No. 264 of 2024 dated November 12, 2024] allowed the writ petition and quashed the order issued by the Department for FY 2017-2018 stating that the orders have been issued beyond the prescribed time limit thereby holding that as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, thus, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.

Citation :
Writ Tax No. 264 of 2024 dated November 12, 2024

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. AV Pharma v. State of UP [Writ Tax No. 264 of 2024 dated November 12, 2024] allowed the writ petition and quashed the order issued by the Department for FY 2017-2018 stating that the orders have been issued beyond the prescribed time limit thereby holding that as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, thus, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.

Facts:

M/s. AV Pharma ("the Petitioner") through its Proprietor, filed a writ petition for setting aside of order dated October 05, 2024 issued in Form GST DRC-13 and December 02, 2023 issued in Form GST DRC-07 ("the Impugned Orders") for the period of FY 2017-2018 ("the Impugned Period") on the ground that the Impugned Orders passed are barred by sub-section (10) of Section 73 of the CGST Act, as the said Impugned Orders have been passed beyond the prescribed time limit, i.e. three years from the due date of filing of annual return, ending on February 05, 2023.

Issue:

Whether Notification extending time limit would be applicable for passing of order under Section 73 for FY 2017-2018?

Held:

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Writ Tax No. 264 of 2024 held as under:

  • Noted that, for the justification of time limit, reliance was placed upon State Notification No. 515/XI-2-23-9(47)/17-T.C.215-U.P.Act-1-2017-Order-(273)-2023 dated April 24, 2023("the Notification"), which has been given retrospective effect only w.e.f. March 31, 2023 which has been adopted from notification issued by Central Government bearing Notification No. 09/2023 - Central Tax dated March 31, 2023, thereby extending the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 for the Impugned Period till December 31, 2023.
  • Further Noted that, as the time limit for passing of order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for the Impugned Period i.e. February 05, 2023 has expired prior to the date of notification coming into effect i.e. March 31, 2023, the Notification extending the time limit for passing of Impugned Order under Section 79 would not be applicable.
  • Further Opined that, the Impugned Orders are beyond the prescribed time lime under Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, as applicable during the Impugned Period.
  • Held that, the Impugned Orders are quashed and the writ petition is allowed.

OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY HAS BEEN ATTACHED

FAQ :

The main issue was whether a notification extending the time limit for passing orders under Section 73 of the CGST Act was applicable for the financial year 2017-18.

The ruling was made by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court.

The financial year in question was 2017-18.

The department's orders were quashed because they were issued beyond the prescribed time limit under Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, and the notification extending the time limit was not applicable.

The original time limit for passing orders under Section 73 for FY 2017-18 expired on February 5, 2023.

The notification extending the time limit came into effect on March 31, 2023.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 262
downloaded 393 times

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
08 August 2026
International Corporate Tax Advisory

Shulke

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
14 August 2026
Article Assistant CA Articleship

Eshwar & Co Chartered Accountants - Nungambakkam

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 August 2026
Audit Manager

K A R M & CO

Mumbai

CMA

View Details
Company
Featured 19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

apricus india

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
27 August 2026
ACCOUNTANT

CHARUPREETI & CO

Noida

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
17 August 2026
Chartered Accountant with US GAAP Experience

Austin Med Solutions Pvt Ltd

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
12 August 2026
Deputy Manager - Finance

RoamPrime Technologies Private Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details