Exemption sought by the applicant will depend upon services provided in terms of specific contracts, entered with respective service recipients.

Last updated: 20 January 2021
Quick Summary
This advance ruling clarifies that any exemption sought by the applicant for services provided will be evaluated based on the specific contracts entered into with the respective service recipients. The applicant, M/s Jayshreeben Rameshchandra Kothari, sought a ruling on their liability to pay tax on goods like videography equipment hired out to government entities undertaking functions under Article 243G of the Constitution.

Court :
Gujrat AAR

Brief :
The applicant is a Proprietor of M/s Dimple Colour Lab, having a GSTIN: 24ARDPK0507E1ZH, filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the GGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs. 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act.

Citation :
ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/37/2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in GST
Views : 130
downloaded 219 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation
  2. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  3. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  4. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  5. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  6. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  7. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  8. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  9. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  10. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Vinay GroverVinay GroverPro Member SURESH KRISHNASAMYSURESH KRISHNASAMYPro Member P.S.HarishankarP.S.HarishankarPro Member N N V SatishN N V SatishPro Member CA.Pinank Arvindbhai ShahCA.Pinank Arvindbhai Shah
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category