These two appeals are filed by the assessee against order dated 19/01/2018 passed by CIT(A)-2, Gurgaon, for assessment year 2009-10 & 2010-11 respectively.
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 02.01.2018 of the Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, relevant to the A.Y. 2013-2014.
Both the above captioned appeals by the assessee are preferred against the order of the CIT(A) - Aligarh, dated 13.01.2016 pertaining to A.Ys 2011-12 and 2012-13.
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A) – 2, New Delhi, dated 19.02.2018 pertaining to A.Y 2010-11.
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 7th June, 2019 of the CIT(A)-15, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2016-17.
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 28th August, 2019 of the CIT(A), Ghaziabad, relating to assessment year 2015-16.
This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 25-04-2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2014-15.
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-8, New Delhi [ The ld CIT (A)] dated 15.01.2020 wherein, the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [ The Act] by the Joint
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dt. 01/06/2019 of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana.
The assessee to explain why the arm’s length price (ALP) of the AMP expenditure should not be determined by applying the Bright Line Test (BLT) method.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English