Treatment of Unexplained Investments under the Income Tax Act, 1961

Last updated: 10 August 2021

Save Share

Quick Summary

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed an appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the CIT(A). The assessee argued they were denied a proper hearing on their appeal concerning unexplained investments. The Tribunal found that the appeal was dismissed ex parte without the assessee being heard on merits, and therefore, a fresh opportunity for a fair hearing is to be provided.

Court :
ITAT Hyderabad

Brief :
This is assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2005-06 against the order of CIT(Appeals)-4, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2016. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal.

Citation :
ITA No. 695/Hyd./2016

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD ‘A’ BENCH : Hyderabad
(Through Video Conference)
Before Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, Judicial Member
And
Shri A. Mohan Alankamony, Accountant Member
ITA No. 695/Hyd./2016
Assessment Year: 2005-06

Sri M. Bal Reddy

Hyderabad

PAN: ADNPM3674J

Appellant

ITO, Ward 16(1)

Hyderabad

Respondent

For Assessee: Shri P. Vinod, Adv.
For Revenue: Sh. Pavitran Kumar, D.R
Date of Hearing : 14/07/2021
Date of Pronouncement : 26/07/2021
O R D E R

This is assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2005-06 against the order of CIT(Appeals)-4, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2016. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal.

2. Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that though the name of assessee’s counsel is recorded as having appeared, only one opportunity of hearing was given and assessee’s counsel could not appear on such date and the CIT(A) proceeded to decide the appeal ex parte the assessee. Ld.counsel, therefore, prayed that another opportunity of hearing on merits may be given to assessee.
Ld.DR was also heard.

3. Having regard to rival contentions and material placed on record, we find that only one date was given to assessee on which date, the assessee was not represented and the assessee was not heard on merits and the appeal was dismissed. Therefore, we deem it fit and proper to remit the case back to the file of CIT(A) for reconsideration of the issue in accordance with law. Needless to mention that assessee shall be given a fair opportunity of hearing. Accordingly, this appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in Open Court on 26/07/2021.

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

FAQ :

The appeal concerned the treatment of unexplained investments under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and whether the assessee received a fair hearing.

The assessee appealed because the CIT(A) decided their case ex parte, meaning without hearing the assessee's arguments on the merits of the case.

The Tribunal decided to remit the case back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration, ensuring the assessee is given a fair opportunity to be heard.

It means the appeal was formally upheld to allow the case to be re-examined by the lower authority (CIT(A)), but it doesn't represent a final decision on the merits of the investment issue itself.

Attached File : 1442821_4114_1627365997_ita_695.pdf

downloaded 251 times

113 Views Comment Share Income Tax Report

Judgement posted by

Poojitha Raam Vinay

Practice

I simplify complex income tax, TDS, banking, and investment updates into practical insights for taxpayers, salaried professionals, pensioners, and senior citizens. I regularly write on ITR filing, tax compliance, savings schemes, and the latest financial rule changes in India.

View Judgements

Comments