Judgements by FCS Deepak Pratap Singh

When 90% or more of the creditors decide that it will be in the interest of all the stake­holders to permit Settlement Plan filed by promoter of the Corporate Debtor and withdraw Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per Section 12A of the Insol

Supreme Court of India was dealing with the petition filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 18th October 2016 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. By t

The Apex Court earlier in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harichand Rai Chandan Lal held that that 'theft from the premises by forceful and violently' would mean entry by use of any force, however slight it may be.

Denying the appellant's claim on account of upholding an unfavourable interpretation of an ambiguous term would entail the respondent not performing its duties as a government company.

Female heirs of a Hindu governed by the Dayabhaga School of Hindu Law dying intestate could not impress upon their inherited property the character of joint family property. The properties inherited from her husband was assessable in the hands of the

A Person involved in buying goods or availing services for the purpose of earning his livelihood through self-employment would be within the scope of the definition of consumer.

Insurance company can be made liable only in respect of the number of passengers for whom insurance can be taken under the Motor Vehicles Act and for whom insurance has been taken as a fact and not in respect of the other passengers involved in the a

The Apex Court held that - after considering all aspects of the meaning of lease including financial lease held that the Appellant in this case an operational creditor and not a financial creditor and thus was not entitled to treated as so in the CIR

The Hon’ble NCLAT held that in view of the provisions of Section 238 of the IBC 2016 the financial Creditor/ Operational Creditor/Corporate Persons can file an application under Section 7 ,9 & 10 of the I & B Code, 2016 before the respective Adjudica

Hon’ble Tribunal in this case rightly held that company by virtue of being incorporated u/s 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 has committed to the approving authorities under the parent legislation that its activities are for the promotion of its aforesai