Judgements by Guest

Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-6, Ahmedabad passed for the Asstt.Year 2010-11.

The present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against confirmation of levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the ld.CIT(A) vide order dated 4.9.2018 for the Asstt.year 2009-10.

Aggrieved the order dated 01.01.2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Delhi ("Ld. CIT(A)") confirming the order dated 30.01.2017 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the ITO, Ward 41(5)

These two appeals by the assessee and Revenue against the common order dated 27-02-2015 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2005-06.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the final assessment order dated 19.9.2018 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called „the Act‟) in relation to the a

These two appeals by the assessee for the for assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14 are directed against the orders of Dispute Resolution Panel-3, Mumbai.

This appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 06-03-2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2015-16.

"On the facts and circumstances of case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.20,90,19,879/- being the amount received on account of Share Premium, without appreciating the fact that assessee, as recorded in the assessment or

Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2013-14 & 2014-15 contest ommon order of Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-33, Mumbai [CIT(A)], dated 06/12/2018 qua confirmation of certain expense disallowance as well as depreciati

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated 18.06.2019 and pertains to the assessment year (A.Y.) 2012-13 and the issue raised is confirming the