banner_ad

Judgements by Guest

View Full Profile


That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (Appeal) was not justified in confirming the addition of Rs.30,00,000/- on account of unsecured loan on mechanical basis even though all transactions in the account are by account payee che

Posted in Income Tax |   3862 Views



A perusal of the record shows that the assessee furnished a return electronically on 30.11.2006 by declaring NIL income and claimed a refund of Rs.41.04.516/- out of TDS and self assessment tax. On the basis of selection of case under scrutiny notice

Posted in Income Tax |   2609 Views



On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of commission paid amounting to Rs. 16,80,000/-. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made u/s

Posted in Income Tax |   2870 Views



That CIT(A) has erred in law in not appreciating that notice issued and served under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act is beyond the stipulated period and order passed in pursuance to such notice is without jurisdiction and bad in law.

Posted in Income Tax  11 comments |   3309 Views



This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld CIT(A) dated 4.10.2010. The grounds of assessee was not afforded a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against enhancement.

Posted in Income Tax |   2446 Views



We have heard the arguments of both the sides and perused the material placed before us. The facts of the case are that both the assessees are minor children of Shri Kamal Piyush. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year under consi

Posted in Income Tax  1 comments |   3850 Views



The return of income was filed on 31.03.2008 declaring income at Rs.1,01,784/-. The assessment was finalized u/s 143(3) on 29.12.2009 by making an addition of Rs.12,84,516/- on account of bogus sundry creditors and Rs.48,540/- on account of concealed

Posted in Income Tax  1 comments |   3644 Views



Non presense of the appellant without taking adjournment.

Posted in Income Tax |   3667 Views



The CIT(A) has erred on facts and in the law in cancelling the order dated 14.6.2011 passed by the ACIT (TDS), Noida and in directing that provisions contained in sec. 194C is applicable on the payment made by M/s Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Posted in Income Tax |   4604 Views



We have heard the arguments of both the sides and perused the material placed before us. The penalty has been levied in respect of the two disallowances made by the Assessing Officer under Section 43B:- (i) Disallowance of interest amounting to `7

Posted in Income Tax |   3690 Views




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 May 2026
Article Assistants

Acupro Consulting

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
U.S. Financial Reporting & Consolidation Manager

Karia Overseas

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Karan Gupta & Co.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 June 2026
Article

Rakhecha & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Audit assistant

Displayandbeyond

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
16 May 2026
Account & Audit Asst

RAHUL KHANDEBHARAD & ASSOCIATES

Nashik

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 May 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 26 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details