Judgements by Guest

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the learned CIT(A)-7, Chennai dated 28.06.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2013-14.

The assessee filed this appeal against the consolidated orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 9, Chennai, particularly against the order in ITA Nos.170/17-18 dated 31.07.2019 for the assessment year 2014-15. 

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dt. 13/08/2019 of the Ld. CIT(A)-3 Ludhiana.

This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Chandigarh dt. 31/10/2019.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Initially, multiple issues were agitated before us, but eventually, we have confined our consideration only to one aspect of making the comprehensive scheme for optout.

This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, hereinafter referred as “ld. CIT(A)” Surat dated 27.02.2017 for the assessment year (AY) 2012-13. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) on 23-01-2017 deleting penalty of Rs.1,48,40,838/- imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) by invoking Explanation 7 to section 271 (1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (he

This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the directions of the Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) dated 27.11.2020 passed u/s.144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) for the assessment year 2016-17 as per

By way of this stay application, the assessee seeks grant of extension of stay for the outstanding demand of 31,35,68,000, pertaining to the assessment year 2014–15.

Both these appeals are filed by the assessee directed against the Common order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Kolkata [hereinafter the “CIT(A)”], passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), dated 06.06