GST Judgements

The applicant M/s. Trellborg Marine Systems pvt.ltd., 1702-1709, 17thfloor, B-Block, West Gate, YMCA club, S.G.Highway, Ahmedabad-380015 is engaged in the business of trading of products like fixtures, buoys, bollards,frontal frames and fascia pads w

The applicant M/s. Aristo Bullion pvt.ltd., R.B.Chamber, B/3. Chanla Ole, Manek Chowk, Ahmedabad-380001 has submitted that they recently registered as a private limited company with effect from 25.07.2020 for which Certificate of Incorporation is iss

The AAR, Karnataka in the matter of M/S. SPSS South Asia Pvt. Ltd., [Advance Ruling No. KAR/ADRG/15 of 2021, dated March 24, 2021] held that, supply of license of pre-developed or pre-designed software by assessee amounts to supply of goods and said

The AAAR, Tamil Nadu in the matter of Kalyan Jewellers India Ltd. [Order-in-Appeal No. AAAR/11/2021 (AR), dated March 30, 2021] modified the order passed by the AAR, Tamil Nadu to the extent that vouchers are neither good nor service and the Central

Input tax credit is a beneficial piece of legislation but subject to various conditions and limitations prescribed under Section 16 and 17 of CGST Act, 2017.

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in Shri Nandhi Dhall Mills India Pvt. Ltd. v. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGST &Ors. [W.P. No. 5192 of 2020 and WMP. No. 6135 of 2020] directed the Revenue Department to refund the amount of INR 2 crore collected from

The Hon'ble AAR, Karnataka in Re: M/s Page Industries Limited [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 54/2020 dated December 15, 2020] held that assessee is in essence not eligible to claim input tax credit ('ITC') on promotional products/materials and marketin

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. Pepsi Foods Ltd. [Civil Appeal Nos. 1106 to 1139 of 2021 decided on April 6, 2021] has upheld the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's verdict of partially striking down third proviso to Section

The Hon'ble AAR Gujarat in M/s. Shree Arbuda Transport (Advance Ruling No.: GUJ/GAAR/R/82/2020 decided on September 17, 2020) has held that the provisions for seeking advance ruling is limited to the activities conducted byM/s. Shree Arbuda Transport

The Hon'ble Jammu & Kashmir High Court in Navneet R. Jhanwar v. State Tax Officer and Ors. [WP (C) No. 443/2021, dated March 17, 2021] quashed the refund rejection order passed by the Revenue Authority rejecting the claim for refund without giving an