Income Tax Judgements

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned CIT(A)-1, Coimbatore dated 21.01.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2015-16.

 This appeal filed by assessee is directed against order of learned CIT(A)-7, Chennai dated 28.06.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.S.A. No. 4848/2016, by which the High Court has disposed of the said second appeal modifying th

The respondent is in the business of manufacture and export of computer software. It filed returns of income for the Assessment Year 2008-09 on 30.09.2008, declaring an income of Rs.98,03,41,570/- which was processed on 8.06.2011, determining the tot

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 23.04.2021which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had fil

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 23.04.2021which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had fil

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an application dated 20.04.2021 on behalf of the assessee has been placed on record wherein the assessee has submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw this appeal since assessee had filed Form 1 a

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Fo

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Fo

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2012-13 arises from the CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad’s order dated 12-11-2018 passed in case No.10018/2018-19/A3/CIT(A)-6, in proceedings u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both the parties. Case fil