Ashok L Vasani, Kolkata I.T.O.,Ward-34(2), Kolkata

Last updated: 18 May 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed Ashok L. Vasani to withdraw his appeal for the assessment year 2009-10. This decision was made after the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The Tribunal noted that if the scheme proposal is not accepted, the assessee can apply to recall the order.

Court :
ITAT Kolkata

Brief :
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form-1 & Form-2 before the Competent Authority and is awaiting the issue of Form No. 3 from the Competent Authority. Therefore, taking into consideration the fact that since the assessee has opted for the Scheme for the AY 2009-10, there is no point in keeping the impugned appeal pending.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 1993/Kol/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 163
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  2. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement
  3. ITAT Jodhpur: Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Merely on General Investigation Report
  4. CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside ₹22.84 Crore Service Tax Demand Against HCL Infosystems
  5. CESTAT Delhi Holds LED Modules Classifiable Under CTH 8539; Rejects Department's Classification Under CTH 9405
  6. Incremental GST burden on pre-GST works contracts is recoverable only from the contracting employer and not from the State or tax authorities
  7. Time Spent in Pursuing Rectification Application under Section 161 of the CGST Act Excludible While Computing Limitation for Filing Appeal under Section 107
  8. Cancellation of GST registration based on defective verification reports fails the statutory test of 'reasons to believe’
  9. Limitation for filing GST appeal runs from the date of actual communication of the order as declared by the dealer unless rebutted by the Revenue through cogent material
  10. Supreme Court: Cruise Operators Eligible for Section 44B Presumptive Taxation; Hospitality Services Do Not Change Nature of ‘Carriage’

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Thanwar ChhatwaniThanwar ChhatwaniPro Member CA.Gopal RathiCA.Gopal RathiPro Member Sagar KhakhiwalaSagar KhakhiwalaPro Member SURESH KRISHNASAMYSURESH KRISHNASAMYPro Member PhaniPhani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category