Anju Agarwal, Kolkata I.T.O.,Ward-49(3), Kolkata

This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case concerns an appeal filed by Anju Agarwal against an order for the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee did not appear for the hearing but submitted an application stating she had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to be withdrawn, with the option for the assessee to recall the order if her scheme proposal is not accepted.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C(SMC)” BENCH, KOLKATA

[Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]

I.T.A. No. 1975/Kol/2019
Assessment Year:2011-12

Anju Agarwal
(PAN: ACXPA1099E)
Appellant 

Vs. 

Income-tax Officer, Ward-49(3),
Kolkata.
Respondent

Date of Virtual Hearing 27.04.2021
Date of Pronouncement 27.04.2021

For the Appellant N o n e
For the Respondent Shri Jayanta Khanra, JCIT, Sr. DR

ORDER

 This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-15, Kolkata dated 24.06.2019 for AY 2011-12.

2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 23.04.2021which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form1 & Form-2 before the Competent Authority and is awaiting the issue of Form No. 3 from the Competent Authority. Therefore, taking into consideration the fact that since the assessee has opted for the Scheme for the AY 2011-12, there is no point in keeping the impugned appeal pending.

3. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, I treat this submission of the assessee informing the Tribunal the fact that assessee has opted for the said scheme, therefore, I allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal. In case, if the competent authority as per the scheme does not accept the assessee’s proposal to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, then the assessee is at liberty to move an application for recalling this order. With the aforesaid caveat, I allow the assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal.

4. Needless to say that my aforesaid action allowing the assessee to withdraw the appeal, will not come in the way of the competent authority of Revenue to accept the assssee’s said option/scheme for availing “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.

5. In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

 Order is pronounced in the open court.

 Sd/-
 (Aby. T. Varkey)
 Judicial Member
 Dated : 27th April, 2021
JD(Sr.P.S.)

Copy of the order forwarded to:
1. Appellant – Ms. Anju Agarwal, Block-A, 173-174, Bangur Avenue,
Kolkata-700 055.
2 Respondent – ITO, Ward-49(3), Kolkata
3.CIT(A)-15, Kolkata. (sent through e-mal)
4.CIT , Kolkata
5.ITAT, Kolkata. (sent through e-mal)

 /True Copy, By order,

Assistant Registrar