Are jackfruit and banana chips sold without brand name classifiable as namkeens under the CGST Act?

Last updated: 18 August 2021
Quick Summary
This advance ruling considers whether unbranded jackfruit chips and banana chips fall under the classification of 'namkeens' for Goods and Services Tax (GST) purposes. The Authority for Advance Ruling examined the nature of these products to determine their correct tax classification under the CGST Act.

Court :
KERALA AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT

Brief :
Shri Swaminathan M/s Banana Chips and And Halwa Merchant is engaged in supply of goods such as banana chips , halwa and others without brand name.

Citation :
Are jackfruit and banana chips sold without brand name classifiable as namkeens under the CGST Act?

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay pro badge
Published in GST
Views : 102
downloaded 273 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. ITAT Quashes AY 2015-16 Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued After 1 April 2021 Was Invalid
  2. ITAT Condones 2,073-Day Delay and Deletes Addition for Cash Deposit Explained by Property Sale and Savings
  3. ITAT Deletes Addition for Alleged On-Money Payment Due to Lack of Evidence Against Buyer
  4. ITAT Holds Estate with Sole Executor Taxable at Individual Slab Rates, Not Maximum Marginal Rate
  5. ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty Where Section 80P Deduction Was Claimed Under Bona Fide Belief
  6. ITAT Quashes Reassessment Due to Approval from Incompetent Authority Under Section 151
  7. ITAT Condones 78-Month Delay and Remands Case Over Alleged Double Taxation of Income
  8. ITAT Condones 185-Day Delay and Remands Case for Fresh Assessment Due to Company’s Defunct Status
  9. ITAT Condones 123-Day Delay in Filing Appeal and Directs CIT(A) to Decide the Case on Merits
  10. ITAT Quashes Reassessment for AY 2015-16 as Section 148 Notice Issued After 1 April 2021 Was Time-Barred

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member sathish kumar ksathish kumar kPro Member nileshnileshPro Member Keshav DubeyKeshav DubeyPro Member CA jignesh daiyaCA jignesh daiyaPro Member THOMAS JOHNTHOMAS JOHN
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Follow