Allowabilty of Scientific Research Expenditure ::
Court :
Tribunal
Brief :
Held that it is not mandatory under provisions of section 35(1)(iv) that plant and machinery purchased must be put to use. It is enough that the expenditure is incurred on purchase of plant and machinery to be used in research work. Hence, A.O. is not justified in disallowing deduction to the assessee.
Citation :
D.C.I.T. Vs. Metallizing Equipment Co. (P.) Ltd.
Allowabilty of Scientific Research Expenditure
D.C.I.T. Vs. Metallizing Equipment Co. (P.) Ltd. 11/18/2004
IT APPEAL NO. 115, 116 AND 248 (JODH.) OF 1998
Case Fact: Whether A.O. is right in disallowing claim for deduction u/s 35(1)(iv) for capital expenditure on research and development on ground that the assets purchased was not used during the year.
Decision: Held that it is not mandatory under provisions of section 35(1)(iv) that plant and machinery purchased must be put to use. It is enough that the expenditure is incurred on purchase of plant and machinery to be used in research work. Hence, A.O. is not justified in disallowing deduction to the assessee.
CA.Saibaburao Nanduri
Published in Income Tax
Views : 77
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
