Adjudication Order in respect of Morisson Traders and Developments Pvt., Ltd., in the matter of dealings in Illiquid Stock Options at BSE


Last updated: 19 October 2020

Court :
SEBI

Brief :
Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter be referred to as, the “SEBI”) conducted investigation into the trading activity in illiquid stock options on BSE Limited (hereinafter be referred to as, the “BSE”) for the period April 01, 2014 to September 30, 2015 (hereinafter be referred to as, the “Investigation Period”) after observing large scale reversal of trades in the Stock Options segment of the BSE.

Citation :
ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PM/NR/2020-21/9402

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PM/NR/2020-21/9402
UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES) RULES, 1995

In respect of:
Morissons Traders and Developments Pvt., Ltd.,
PAN: AACCM2137M

In the matter of Dealings in Illiquid Stock Options at the BSE

FACTS OF THE CASE
1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter be referred to as, the “SEBI”) conducted investigation into the trading activity in illiquid stock options on BSE Limited (hereinafter be referred to as, the “BSE”) for the period April 01, 2014 to September 30, 2015 (hereinafter be referred to as, the “Investigation Period”) after observing large scale reversal of trades in the Stock Options segment of the BSE.

2. The investigation revealed that during the Investigation Period, a total of 2,91,643 trades comprising 81.38% of all the trades executed in the BSE Stock Options Segment were trades which involved reversal of buy and sell positions by the clients and counterparties in a contract. It was observed that Morisson Traders and Developments Pvt., Ltd., (hereinafter be referred to as, the “Noticee”) was one such client whose reversal trades involved squaring off open positions with a significant difference without any basis for such change in the contract price. The aforesaid reversal trades allegedly resulted into generation of artificial volumes, leading to allegations that the Noticee had violated the provisions of Regulation 3(a), (b), (c), (d) and Regulation 4(1), 4(2) (a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trading Practices related to Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003 (hereinafter be referred to as, the “SEBI PFUTP Regulations”).

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

Guest
Published in LAW
Views : 69
downloaded 262 times

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
Article Assistant

Sahil Agarwal & Company

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT, CA SemiQualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 July 2026
Senior accountant

RJ Public School

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Felicity Adobe LLP

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Chartered Accountant (Indirect Taxation)

Gowra Ventures Pvt Ltd

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
CA Article

Pipara & Co. LLP.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details