Criteria for Unexplained Investments u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act

Author
View profile
Last updated: 13 November 2021
Quick Summary
This judgement clarifies the criteria for unexplained investments under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The case involved a construction company that failed to provide adequate details to the Assessing Officer. While the revenue's appeal was dismissed, the assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, suggesting a nuanced approach to assessing such investments.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
Aforesaid cross appeals for Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-12, Mumbai [CIT(A)] dated 27/03/2019.

Citation :
I.T.A. No.4910/Mum/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713

 
downloaded 358 times


Poojitha Raam Vinay

Judgement posted by

Practice

I simplify complex income tax, TDS, banking, and investment updates into practical insights for taxpayers, salaried professionals, pensioners, and senior citizens. I regularly write on ITR filing, tax compliance, savings schemes, and the latest financial rule changes in India.

View Judgements
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  2. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  3. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  4. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  5. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  6. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  7. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  8. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  9. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  10. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member RinkuRinkuPro Member Suresh ShahSuresh ShahPro Member Kishore Kumar PahujaKishore Kumar PahujaPro Member Sagar GoyalSagar GoyalPro Member Anjum AshrafAnjum Ashraf
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
08 October 2026
SALES TELECALLER

HIRE NOVA

Lucknow

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accountant

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 21 September 2026
CA Article Assistant

KK & Company Chartered Accountant

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Accounts and Tax Associate

POOJA R TELI & CO

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
17 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

Dass Gupta & Associates

Gurgaon

CA

View Details
Company
15 September 2026
Client-site CA associate

Aditya Muley and Co

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Account Executive

Elite Taxation

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details