Reporting in TIS

the sale of land and building value as reflected in TIS is a summation of the same figure reported in tds statement and sft transaction thereby doubling the value of sale of land and building . The scenario becomes totally erroneous when there are multiple buyers and sellers for the same property .The software shows total value of the deal against each name thereby giving a totally distorted figure .

does this require correction before filing returns and if so how does one correct this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Replies (2)
Quick Summary
The discussion addresses an issue where TIS (Taxpayer Information Summary) may double-count property sale values due to duplicate reporting from TDS statements and SFT transactions. This can lead to an erroneous total value, especially with multiple buyers and sellers. The advice provided is not to correct TIS directly, but to report the actual sale consideration and cost of acquisition in your Income Tax Return (ITR). Additionally, you should submit feedback on the AIS portal, marking the duplicated transaction as 'Information is duplicate or incorrect' to rectify the record.

It already says that value of the deal is shown in total from different buyers and sellers @ double the original value. So what is to be corrected is that double reflection. Write a single entry for what is to be reflected in the Balance Sheet., existing value and not the Purchase value of different buyers.

TIS double-counting on property sales is a known issue when the same transaction appears twice, once from TDS deducted by the buyer (Form 26QB) and once from SFT data submitted by the registrar.

 

You do not need to correct TIS before filing. Here is what to do:

 

1. In your ITR, report the actual sale consideration and cost of acquisition based on your sale deed, not the TIS figures.

2. Go into the AIS portal (income tax portal, AIS tab), find the duplicated transaction, select it, and submit feedback as "Information is duplicate or incorrect" with a one-line explanation.

3. The IT department uses your submitted ITR values for assessment, not TIS figures, so discrepancies do not automatically trigger demand notices.

 

The key is to not leave the duplicate flagged without a feedback response. This [AIS, Form 26AS and TIS guide](https://taxgarden.in/blog/ais-vs-form-26as-vs-tis-itr-prep-guide-ay-2026-27) explains how to handle these mismatches step by step.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
Article Assistant

ANIVESH CONSULTANTS LLP

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
27 August 2026
ACCOUNTANT

CHARUPREETI & CO

Noida

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
19 August 2026
PAID ARTCILE ASSISTANT

My Legal Tax Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

apricus india

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
24 August 2026
Semi-Qualified CA/CA Finalist - Tax, GST, Audit & Accounts

Bharat Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
COMPLIANCE EXECUTIVE

YMW COMPLIANCE SERVICES LLP

Others

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
CA Articles

Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details