Quy regards refund for the period August 2017

sir, one of the party has applied online refund on 12.2.2018 for the period August 2017 but due to some inconvenient they submitted the requisite documents on 31.5.2020.
then, department can rejected the said refund claim or sanction it.

pls clarify
Replies (6)
Quick Summary
This discussion concerns a refund claim for August 2017, initially filed online in February 2018. The required documents were submitted much later, in May 2020. Participants are debating whether the department can reject the claim due to the delay, considering it might be time-barred. However, it's noted that no acknowledgement or deficiency memo was issued within the standard 15-day period after the online application, and the department recently requested further documentation, suggesting the claim might still be valid for payment.

What is the reason for rejection by Ao recorded
Krisshnan sir, they may rejected the refund considering that time bar. however, they have online submitted with two year.whats ur opinion

AO can accept, reject or issue a deficiency memo within 15 days of the online application of refund. If you have already filed online application, you must have received the order for rejection or acknowledgment.

If refund is available you may utilise the same?

Agree with CA Saloni. if you have submitted online application in 2018 than you definitely received deficiency memo/rejection letter with in 15 days and if the same application is in process (may be by reason of appeal or anything) than this will not consider as time bar.

and if such online application is rejected /cancelled/not replied by you or anything than this is time bar and department can reject the refund.

Swati mam,

department has neither issued acknowledgement nor deficiency memo within 15 days from the date of online refund application dated 12.02.2018 as well as till date.

however, department asked last week over phone regarding issuance of RFD 01B due to non submission of relevant documents of the said refund as prescribed in para 2.3 of the circular 17/17/2017 dated 15.11.2017.
now, the party has submitted the relevant documents,

as such, it appears that the said refund is still alive for payment.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register