no benefit for pe2 passed students

sgree with u - - - -- --- - - - -- 

agree with u -- -  --  -- --------- --- - -  - - - - - -

i agree wit this,every pe2 student must accept this..

Certainly ICAI should do this impartial change.

plz visit the following link:

PEII students please raise your voice.

All peII students plz mail the this injustice to following email id. Its time to make unity and fight for justice.

Concil members

rajkumarfca @ gmail.com; atul.bheda @ icai.org; bhavna.doshi @ googlemail.com; jayant @ icai.org; pankaj @ icai.org; sanjeev @ gmjca.com; msarda @ deloitte.com; dhinal.shah @ in.ey.com; jnshah @ icai.org; nilesh @ kkc.in; sbzaware @ icai.org; devarajareddy @ yahoo.com; mhiregange @ hotmail.com; victorgrace321 @ rediffmail.com; kraghu9999 @ gmail.com; rk @ ssaca.in; gr @ icai.org; skca @ sandsca.com; jv @ icai.org; subodhka @ gmail.com; banabhijit @ hotmail.com; ca.sumantraguha @ gmail.com; vijaymgarg @ yahoo.com; anujgoyal @ icai.org; raviholani @ rediffmail.com; agarwal.s.ca @ gmail.com; ajc @ icai.org; naveen @ dassgupta.com; vinodjainca @ gmail.com; csnanda @ gmail.com; pankajtyagee @ gmail.com; renuka.kumar @ mca.gov.in; sasidharankp @ cag.gov.in; ashutosh.d @ nic.in; narain.d @ nic.in; ushan @ sebi.gov.in; prithvi @ primedatabase.com; sbirla @ birlas.com; anil @ cosmosintl.com

Also to

bosnoida @ icai.org, president @ icai.org, vicepresident @ icai.org

All PEII friend plz come ahead its time to fight against injustice

Agree with poonam , nidhi, lokesh Actually real suffering students are PEII students because their articleship starts after completion of PEII while For PCC students their articleship starts after CPT.

THERE is NEED for the relaxation  for PEII students but institute has give relaxation to PCC students...

Shame on ICAI....!!!!

Everyone knows the position of CA Students these days. The course has become so uncertain that it is spoiling the careers of students. But just spare a thought for those PE-II students who are still giving their exams & are being treated with a pass percentage of 1%. The position of PE-II pass-outs is also no different. The Course for people like me (PE-II passout) has become very lengthy in comparison to PCC Students. It seems to be taking an eternity. It seems that PE-II students are the labour class in this course. Even PCC/IPCC students would agree that PE-II students are being treated badly by the Institute. To bring our problems to the notice of the Institute, I would request all students to forward the following letter to the Institute's E-Mail ID - . The Support of PCC and IPCC Students would be highly appreciated. Here's the Letter:

Respected Sir/Madam,

SUB: Problems regarding Eligibility of PE-II Students to write\attempt CA Final Exams

Through this letter, I would like to bring to your notice the hardships faced by PE-II Students. Unlike a PCC Student where First Eligible CA Final Attempt remains unchanged provided such student passes his PCC exam with a maximum of four attempts, A PE-II Student's eligibility to give his/her First CA final attempt keeps extending by 6 months on every failure in PE-II Exams.

Unfortunately, I have been one of the targets of the above problem & am facing such consequences. I daily come across PCC students who are younger than me & have taken more attempts than me in PCC/PE-II, but still they are giving their Final exam One year before me.

I Kindly request the Board of Studies to be Just and Fair to all the students. The Institute should either reduce the Articleship period for PE-II Students or Amend the eligibility requirement related to completion of articles for attempting CA Final exam For PE-II Students.

Present Eligibility Requirement: He /She is Eligible to appear in the Final examination Pending 12 months of articleship.

Proposed Eligibility Requirement: --> Either Reduce the Articleship Period of PE-II Students from 3 years to 2.5 years. OR --> Make PE-II Students Eligible to appear in atleast One Group of CA Final Examination pending 18 months of articleship.

This matter is very serious and is causing various inequalities amongst CA Students. I kindly request the Board of Studies to look into this matter quickly, be just and fair to all categories of students & bring about necessary changes in the rules regarding CA PE-II pass-outs.

Looking Forward to a Positive & Quick Decision from your side and expecting approval of this impartial change in the Course.

Best Regards,

ICAI will never help us .

Kindly contact MCA ( Ministery of corporate affairs ) for the injustice which we suffers.

Folllowing is the email id of Secretary of MCA,

This was my response too when I saw the notification about PCC. I think the problem is that there have already been so many PE2 students who have given Final attempt, and passed/failed, so they will protest if exception is made for those who were left. Maybe? But allowing to give one group is a great idea. We must demand this.

Following is my conversion with CA Vinod Jain (Chairman of BOS) regarding same but ............

But sir what is for those students who has not converted from pe II to IPCC and PCC i.e. in final from passing  peII examination. There is totaly injustice with them???

What's New

1. Important Announcement-Relaxation from undergoing Orientation Programme and extension of completion date of Information Technology Training (ITT) - (06-08-2010)

2. Important Announcement-Eligibility criteria applicable to different streams students for appearing in the Final Examination to be held in November, 2010 examination and onwards - (06-08-2010)

3. Important Announcement-Eligibility to appear in Final Examination – November, 2010 Examination and onwards - (06-08-2010)

Browse to www.icai.org

Poonam, this is a superb suggestion, and has been put across in a  very reasonable and sensible manner. Very well done on behalf of all of us. I hope they can do the needful, as we have suffered so much mentally already. It is not easy even in articles when you are in the same batch as 19-20 year old kids. And those CPT kids had it so easy for them , I cannot understand why their attmpt has to be brought forward and ours isn't. it makes no sense. Well done again.