Assessee, an individual, has 2 businesses with turnover as under for AY 2008-09:
a) Medical shop – turnover Rs. 37.5 lakhs
b) Lodging business – turnover Rs 10.8 lakhs
For medical shop, tax audit was opted u/s 44AF(5) and report was obtained in time and was filed during assessment u/s 143(3). For lodging business, no tax audit was done since turnover was below Rs 40 lakhs for that business. ITO opines that business of lodging should also have been audited u/s 44AB since total turnover for both businesses put together exceeded Rs 40 lakhs. Assessee cited provisions of Sec 44AF(4), whereby, if tax audit is opted under sub section (5), the turnover of that business should be excluded for the purpose of Sec. 44AB (to find overall turnover limit). ITO is not accepting this. Whether assessee’s contention is correct?. Any case law may please be cited.