Is there any restriction in terms of limit of investment in case of a professional adopting 44 ada?

175 views 6 replies

I am a professional (doctor) earning professional income. My total gross receipt is <rs.50 Lac last FY. I intent to use section 44 ADA and pay tax for 50% deemed profit. Now let me state my problem via an illustration

Illustration:

Suppose i earned Rs.48 Lac last year. My deemed profit @ 50% would be Rs.24 lac. And therefore i would be paying tax for rs.24 lac. But can the net invested amount by me last year be say rs.30 lac? (ie bank deposits+ other investments like LIC , Mutual funds etc).

I had read through the section 44 ADA and this document as well

https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/files_download.asp?msg_id=1788139

All those very clearly mentions that I can very well claim 50% profits under 44 ADA. Only thing unclear is that if i have investments of 30 lac, its a clear statement that I had profits above 50%....My question is whether i am under legal obligation to give taxes for my entire (>50%) profits? I know that i could volunatrily declare more than 50% profits under 44 ADA....but should i mandatorily give taxes for rs.30 lac n the above example-?-that is the question

Can i opt to keep the 6 lakhs just like that (rs.30 lac-rs24 lac)?

Of course....there is no clause anywhere that says a person in my situation needs to pay more.....that was my belief,,,But i had to ask this now....because i saw the following post elsewhere:

 

https://www.taxtuts.in/2018/01/section-44ada.H T M L

 

So kindly clarify!!!

Replies (6)

 Section 44ADA allow to show profit more than 50 % in total Receipt 

If Your Receipt note more than Rs. 50 Lakh 

So above Income Under tha Head of PGBP

You are eligible only deduction which is mentioned under the chapter of Deduction ( sec-80 )

Please read my querry carefully. I know I "can" show more than 50% profits...i know that...its explicitly mentioned in section 44 ADA. The question is whether i should "mandatorily" show profits above 50% ...."can" and "mandatory" are different....hope you understand my point.

I had also given an ilustration along with my querry..please refer to that....In the context of that illustration, my querry is whether i can pay taxes for only rs.24 lac and rs.30 lac seen in my bank accounts/investments etc?

I know that lot of "depreciations" (car, ultrasound machines etc) can be claimed as expenses---therefore my bank deposit for one year could be more than 50% of profits. and yet i could have high "expenses".....Its just that i need to know the opinion of experts here !!!

 

Also ,,,,reposting links from previous posts:

https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/files/419621_20180106211358_new_winrar_zip_archive.rar

https://www.taxtuts.in/2018/01/section-44ada.H T M L

Originally posted by : Dr.Jyothish Vijay
Please read my querry carefully. I know I "can" show more than 50% profits...i know that...its explicitly mentioned in section 44 ADA. The question is whether i should "mandatorily" show profits above 50% ...."can" and "mandatory" are different....hope you understand my point.

I had also given an ilustration along with my querry..please refer to that....In the context of that illustration, my querry is whether i can pay taxes for only rs.24 lac and rs.30 lac seen in my bank accounts/investments etc?

I know that lot of "depreciations" (car, ultrasound machines etc) can be claimed as expenses---therefore my bank deposit for one year could be more than 50% of profits. and yet i could have high "expenses".....Its just that i need to know the opinion of experts here !!!

 

Also ,,,,reposting links from previous posts:

https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/files/419621_20180106211358_new_winrar_zip_archive.rar

https://www.taxtuts.in/2018/01/section-44ada.H T M L

You pay Tax on Rs. 24 Lakh

The presumptive income computed @ 50% is the final income and no further expenses will
be allowed
 

Originally posted by : Dr.Jyothish Vijay
I am a professional (doctor) earning professional income. My total gross receipt is
Illustration:

Suppose i earned Rs.48 Lac last year. My deemed profit @ 50% would be Rs.24 lac. And therefore i would be paying tax for rs.24 lac. But can the net invested amount by me last year be say rs.30 lac? (ie bank deposits+ other investments like LIC , Mutual funds etc).

I had read through the section 44 ADA and this document as well

https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/files_download.asp?msg_id=1788139

All those very clearly mentions that I can very well claim 50% profits under 44 ADA. Only thing unclear is that if i have investments of 30 lac, its a clear statement that I had profits above 50%....My question is whether i am under legal obligation to give taxes for my entire (>50%) profits? I know that i could volunatrily declare more than 50% profits under 44 ADA....but should i mandatorily give taxes for rs.30 lac n the above example-?-that is the question

Can i opt to keep the 6 lakhs just like that (rs.30 lac-rs24 lac)?

Of course....there is no clause anywhere that says a person in my situation needs to pay more.....that was my belief,,,But i had to ask this now....because i saw the following post elsewhere:

 

https://www.taxtuts.in/2018/01/section-44ada.H T M L

 

So kindly clarify!!!


Please go through the below post in the forum ....>>

https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/presumptive-taxation-query-462993.asp

thank you for the response...very useful links indeed


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register