Independent director

Co Act 2013 850 views 6 replies

 

As per section 2(47) 

 “independent director” means an independent director referred to in sub-section (5) of section 149

but the definition of independent director is given in section 149 sub-section (6).

kindly see section 149 sub-sections (5) and (6) given here under and then let me know whether it's a mistake in law?

 

(5) Every company existing on or before the date of commencement of this Act shall, within one year from such commencement or from the date of notification of the rules in this regard as may be applicable, comply with the requirements of the provisions of sub-section (4).

(6) An independent director in relation to a company, means a director other than a managing director or a whole-time director or a nominee director,—

(a) who, in the opinion of the Board, is a person of integrity and possesses relevant expertise and experience;

(b) (i) who is or was not a promoter of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company;

(ii) who is not related to promoters or directors in the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company;

(c) who has or had no pecuniary relationship with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company, or their promoters, or directors, during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year;

(d) none of whose relatives has or had pecuniary relationship or transaction with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company, or their promoters, or directors, amounting to two per cent. or more of its gross turnover or total income or fifty lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed, whichever is lower, during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year;

(e) who, neither himself nor any of his relatives—

(i) holds or has held the position of a key managerial personnel or is or has been employee of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company in any of the three financial years immediately preceding the financial year in which he is proposed to be appointed;

(ii) is or has been an employee or proprietor or a partner, in any of the three financial years immediately preceding the financial year in which he is proposed to be appointed, of—

(A) a firm of auditors or company secretaries in practice or cost auditors of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company; or

(B) any legal or a consulting firm that has or had any transaction with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company amounting to ten per cent. or more of the gross turnover of such firm;

(iii) holds together with his relatives two per cent. or more of the total voting power of the company; or

(iv) is a Chief Executive or director, by whatever name called, of any non- profit organisation that receives twenty-five per cent. or more of its receipts from the company, any of its promoters, directors or its holding, subsidiary or associate company or that holds two per cent. or more of the total voting power of the company; or

(f) who possesses such other qualifications as may be prescribed. 

 

Replies (6)

Yes, there are several errors in Companies Act 2013 like this.  It is one of them.

 

 

Yes it is a mistake....yes

hmm ... correct  ...  they will also rectify this error soon ... 

naya naya act h ... thodi bht to rectify honi ab bhi baki hogi ,... 

yes mistake is here

Thanks... I have found other errors like this... Is there any way to report them ?

Pl let me know, is it necessary to obtain DIN before getting entry in data bank of independent directors being maintaintained by icai/icsi/icmai. Jp Gupta, fcma


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register