Immovable property sold and cash recd deposited

Tax queries 2056 views 18 replies

Sir, I hav one query in Income -tax , regarding immovable property The assesse has sold property for Rs. 48 Lakh for which he received cash and the cash has been deposited in bank at same day . Now Assessee want to declare the sale proceeds in income tax returns for the Asst Year 2018-19. Is there any violation for receiving cash mode of the sale proceeds. If any one is there kindly guide me in this regard. Thanks & Regards

Replies (18)

Violation of section 269ST for receiving cash more than 2 lakhs.

Violation of section 269SS for receiving advance on sell of property by cash, worth more than 20,000/-

Thank you for your comments sir , But the seller is uneducated and unaware of the legislative . He had no viable option at thatt time of receiving cash unless the contract for sale has been denied by the buyer. He look forward and received the cash and same has been deposited into his bank accout sir,

Here he has not done anything wrong except depositing the amount so received on even date. Here my humble request to your honour is , is there any waiver of interest is available to him sir, if any pls guide me

Thank you for your comments sir , But the seller is uneducated and unaware of the legislative . He had no viable option at thatt time of receiving cash unless the contract for sale has been denied by the buyer. He look forward and received the cash and same has been deposited into his bank accout sir,

 

Here he has not done anything wrong except depositing the amount so received on even date. Here my humble request to your honour is , is there any waiver of interest is available to him sir, if any pls guide me

Was it during demonetization period?

What was circle rate? and agreement amount?

not sir, it is effected financial year 2017-2018
agreement amount is 48 lakh and the same has fully received.
As the amount is deposited in bank on the same day, there is no violation of section 269ST

If agriculturalist , he can plead for his innocence about the law as otherwise it would be exempt income. Everything depends upon the office/commissioner.

Can u please elaborate same in legal terms mam
Yes i agree with u sir as a agricultural point of view is correct but he is not an agricultural person, he's from labour based worker
there's no such relief given in section 269st.. to preclude oneself from 269st
Originally posted by : rama krishnan
there's no such relief given in section 269st.. to preclude oneself from 269st

Yes tehnically true but there still prevails the system of " Natural Justice " , in a society like ours almost 99% of the general population is not even aware of basic laws ...so here in this case if the said person can prove the genuineness of the transaction along with his background / ignorance then I think he will not be denied justice ...


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register