Menu
Clb order valid or not?
1. CIPL, a non-banking finance company, had submitted an application for approval of a scheme of arrangement under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 before the High Court. Soham, a deposit holder of CIPL, has filed an application before the Company Law Board (CLB) for ordering repayment of deposits. The CLB passed an order to repay the deposits under section 45QA (2) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. The CIPL challenged the order of CLB in the High Court. Offer your comments whether CLB is correct in passing such an order in the given circumstances.
Replies (2)
As the matter is before the Hon'ble High Court, it would not be appropriate to speculate the outcome of the case. Before filing the application in the Hon'ble High Court, if views were solicited it would have been fair but now the matter is sub-judice. I understand your asking for views on the orders passed by Hon'ble CLB, still you can discuss these matters with your legal counsel and I hope he or she would have given an opinion and directed you to file an appeal before the Hon'ble high Court, which you seem to have done.
Thank you for valuable reply..
But one answer: whether CLB is correct in passing such an order in the given circumstances?
Recent Topic
- Schedule FA query for this AY 2026-27
- Business income source for husband and wife
- Set off of LTCL against STCG under section 536(2n)
- Audit Workflow tool
- Is CA through direct entry easy for a commerce stu
- Dividend and withholding tax - DTAA- RSU
- NRI Query: Capital Gains Tax Exemption under Secti
- Royalty payment to UK
- Calculate ITR2 tax with equity and non equity prof
- LTCG on residential property sale - Rebate?
Related Topics
CAclubindia
