Whether it is required to write both old section (1956) and new section (2013) or any comparsion in a single question for nov 2014??
Menu
Ca final law
Replies (2)
No such requirement. But, we have to mention whether concern section is from comp act 1956 or 2013. For instance, as per sec 285 of comp act 1956.. As per sec 161(1) of comp act 2013..like this we have to mention wch companys act, bcoz nw both acts are applicable.
Impressing the examiner is an art. But such art should be to showcase the depth of your knowledge / understanding and not to tease or fool the examiner.
Quote the correct section only if you are hundred percent sure, else quoting wrong section could spell disaster to you. When a question is specifically relates to Companies Act, 1956 and the relevant provision under Companies Act, 2013 is not applicable for November 2014 Examination, then do not try to be over smart. Just keep it simple, by answering to the point as this can fetch you good marks.
Good luck.
Recent Threads
- GSTR- 9 query to rcm
- Calculation of Borrowing Cost as per AS 16
- GSTR 9C
- Presumptive tax 44ADA
- Performances of actors and singers
- Discount Received Income in GSTR  - 9
- Whether afer responding to query amount of expen
- Sample of board meetings of a private limited comp
- Filed IT return under old scheme , can he file rev
- Reconciling Zoho Books with Tally
Related Threads
CAclubindia
